Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
JAMA Surg. 2024 Apr 1;159(4):429-437. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.7872.
Implementation of new cancer treatment strategies as recommended by evidence-based guidelines is often slow and suboptimal.
To improve the implementation of guideline-based best practices in the Netherlands in pancreatic cancer care and assess the impact on survival.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter, stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial compared enhanced implementation of best practices with usual care in consecutive patients with all stages of pancreatic cancer. It took place from May 22, 2018 through July 9, 2020. Data were analyzed from April 1, 2022, through February 1, 2023. It included all patients in the Netherlands with pathologically or clinically diagnosed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. This study reports 1-year follow-up (or shorter in case of deceased patients).
The 5 best practices included optimal use of perioperative chemotherapy, palliative chemotherapy, pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT), referral to a dietician, and use of metal stents in patients with biliary obstruction. A 6-week implementation period was completed, in a randomized order, in all 17 Dutch networks for pancreatic cancer care.
The primary outcome was 1-year survival. Secondary outcomes included adherence to best practices and quality of life (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] global health score).
Overall, 5887 patients with pancreatic cancer (median age, 72.0 [IQR, 64.0-79.0] years; 50% female) were enrolled, 2641 before and 2939 after implementation of best practices (307 during wash-in period). One-year survival was 24% vs 23% (hazard ratio, 0.98, 95% CI, 0.88-1.08). There was no difference in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (11% vs 11%), adjuvant chemotherapy (48% vs 51%), and referral to a dietician (59% vs 63%), while the use of palliative chemotherapy (24% vs 30%; odds ratio [OR], 1.38; 95% CI, 1.10-1.74), PERT (34% vs 45%; OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.28-2.11), and metal biliary stents increased (74% vs 83%; OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.13-2.80). The EORTC global health score did not improve (area under the curve, 43.9 vs 42.8; median difference, -1.09, 95% CI, -3.05 to 0.94).
In this randomized clinical trial, implementation of 5 best practices in pancreatic cancer care did not improve 1-year survival and quality of life. The finding that most patients received no tumor-directed treatment paired with the poor survival highlights the need for more personalized treatment options.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03513705.
重要性:新的癌症治疗策略的实施,按照循证指南推荐,往往是缓慢和不理想的。
目的:提高荷兰胰腺癌治疗中基于指南的最佳实践的实施,并评估其对生存率的影响。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项多中心、阶梯式楔形集群随机试验,比较了最佳实践的增强实施与连续各期胰腺癌患者的常规护理。它于 2018 年 5 月 22 日至 2020 年 7 月 9 日进行。数据于 2022 年 4 月 1 日至 2023 年 2 月 1 日进行分析。它包括荷兰所有经病理或临床诊断为胰腺导管腺癌的患者。本研究报告了 1 年的随访(或在死亡患者中更短)。
干预措施:5 项最佳实践包括围手术期化疗、姑息性化疗、胰腺酶替代疗法(PERT)、向营养师转诊和在胆道梗阻患者中使用金属支架的最佳应用。在所有 17 个荷兰胰腺癌护理网络中,以随机顺序完成了为期 6 周的实施期。
主要结果和测量:主要结果是 1 年生存率。次要结果包括对最佳实践的依从性和生活质量(欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织[EORTC]总体健康评分)。
结果:共有 5887 名胰腺癌患者(中位年龄 72.0 [IQR,64.0-79.0]岁;50%为女性)入组,2641 名在最佳实践实施前,2939 名在最佳实践实施后(307 名在洗脱期)。1 年生存率为 24%与 23%(风险比,0.98,95%CI,0.88-1.08)。新辅助化疗(11%对 11%)、辅助化疗(48%对 51%)和向营养师转诊(59%对 63%)的使用没有差异,而姑息化疗(24%对 30%;优势比[OR],1.38;95%CI,1.10-1.74)、PERT(34%对 45%;OR,1.64;95%CI,1.28-2.11)和金属胆道支架的使用增加(74%对 83%;OR,1.78;95%CI,1.13-2.80)。EORTC 总体健康评分没有改善(曲线下面积,43.9 对 42.8;中位数差异,-1.09,95%CI,-3.05 至 0.94)。
结论和相关性:在这项随机临床试验中,胰腺癌治疗中 5 项最佳实践的实施并没有提高 1 年生存率和生活质量。大多数患者没有接受肿瘤靶向治疗,且生存率较差,这一发现突出了需要更多个性化的治疗选择。
试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03513705。