Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
Critical Care Medicine Branch, National Heart Lung & Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e2356174. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.56174.
Transferring patients to other hospitals because of inpatient saturation or need for higher levels of care was often challenging during the early waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding how transfer patterns evolved over time and amid hospital overcrowding could inform future care delivery and load balancing efforts.
To evaluate trends in outgoing transfers at overall and caseload-strained hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic vs prepandemic times.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study used data for adult patients at continuously reporting US hospitals in the PINC-AI Healthcare Database. Data analysis was performed from February to July 2023.
Pandemic wave, defined as wave 1 (March 1, 2020, to May 31, 2020), wave 2 (June 1, 2020, to September 30, 2020), wave 3 (October 1, 2020, to June 19, 2021), Delta (June 20, 2021, to December 18, 2021), and Omicron (December 19, 2021, to February 28, 2022).
Weekly trends in cumulative mean daily acute care transfers from all hospitals were assessed by COVID-19 status, hospital urbanicity, and census index (calculated as daily inpatient census divided by nominal bed capacity). At each hospital, the mean difference in transfer counts was calculated using pairwise comparisons of pandemic (vs prepandemic) weeks in the same census index decile and averaged across decile hospitals in each wave. For top decile (ie, high-surge) hospitals, fold changes (and 95% CI) in transfers were adjusted for hospital-level factors and seasonality.
At 681 hospitals (205 rural [30.1%] and 476 urban [69.9%]; 360 [52.9%] small with <200 beds and 321 [47.1%] large with ≥200 beds), the mean (SD) weekly outgoing transfers per hospital remained lower than the prepandemic mean of 12.1 (10.4) transfers per week for most of the pandemic, ranging from 8.5 (8.3) transfers per week during wave 1 to 11.9 (10.7) transfers per week during the Delta wave. Despite more COVID-19 transfers, overall transfers at study hospitals cumulatively decreased during each high national surge period. At 99 high-surge hospitals, compared with a prepandemic baseline, outgoing acute care transfers decreased in wave 1 (fold change -15.0%; 95% CI, -22.3% to -7.0%; P < .001), returned to baseline during wave 2 (2.2%; 95% CI, -4.3% to 9.2%; P = .52), and displayed a sustained increase in subsequent waves: 19.8% (95% CI, 14.3% to 25.4%; P < .001) in wave 3, 19.2% (95% CI, 13.4% to 25.4%; P < .001) in the Delta wave, and 15.4% (95% CI, 7.8% to 23.5%; P < .001) in the Omicron wave. Observed increases were predominantly limited to small urban hospitals, where transfers peaked (48.0%; 95% CI, 36.3% to 60.8%; P < .001) in wave 3, whereas large urban and small rural hospitals displayed little to no increases in transfers from baseline throughout the pandemic.
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, study hospitals reported paradoxical decreases in overall patient transfers during each high-surge period. Caseload-strained rural (vs urban) hospitals with fewer than 200 beds were unable to proportionally increase transfers. Prevailing vulnerabilities in flexing transfer capabilities for care or capacity reasons warrant urgent attention.
在 COVID-19 大流行的早期,由于住院饱和或需要更高水平的护理,将患者转移到其他医院通常具有挑战性。了解转移模式如何随着时间的推移以及在医院过度拥挤的情况下演变,可以为未来的护理提供信息交付和负载平衡工作。
评估 COVID-19 大流行期间和流行前时期整体和病例负担紧张医院的外出转移趋势。
设计、地点和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究使用了美国连续报告的 PINC-AI 医疗保健数据库中成人患者的数据。数据分析于 2023 年 2 月至 7 月进行。
大流行波,定义为第 1 波(2020 年 3 月 1 日至 5 月 31 日)、第 2 波(2020 年 6 月 1 日至 9 月 30 日)、第 3 波(2020 年 10 月 1 日至 2021 年 6 月 19 日)、Delta(2021 年 6 月 20 日至 12 月 18 日)和 Omicron(2021 年 12 月 19 日至 2 月 28 日)。
通过 COVID-19 状态、医院城市性和人口普查指数(计算为每日住院患者人数除以名义床位数)评估所有医院每周急性护理转移的累积平均值。在每个医院,使用相同人口普查指数十分位数中流行(与流行前)周的配对比较计算转移计数的平均值差异,并在每个波中平均十分位数医院。对于最高十分位数(即高浪涌)医院,转移的折叠变化(和 95%置信区间)调整了医院水平因素和季节性。
在 681 家医院(205 家农村[30.1%]和 476 家城市[69.9%];360 家[52.9%]小医院(<200 张床)和 321 家[47.1%]大医院(≥200 张床)中,每周每所医院的平均(SD)外出转移量仍低于大流行期间每周 12.1(10.4)次的流行前平均水平,从第 1 波每周 8.5(8.3)次到第 Delta 波每周 11.9(10.7)次。尽管 COVID-19 转移量更多,但在每个国家高浪涌期间,研究医院的整体转移量累计减少。在 99 家高浪涌医院中,与流行前基线相比,外出急性护理转移在第 1 波中减少了 15.0%(95%CI,-22.3%至-7.0%;P<0.001),在第 2 波中恢复到基线(2.2%;95%CI,-4.3%至 9.2%;P=0.52),并且在随后的波中持续增加:第 3 波增加 19.8%(95%CI,14.3%至 25.4%;P<0.001),Delta 波增加 19.2%(95%CI,13.4%至 25.4%;P<0.001),Omicron 波增加 15.4%(95%CI,7.8%至 23.5%;P<0.001)。观察到的增加主要限于小型城市医院,其中转移量在第 3 波中达到峰值(48.0%;95%CI,36.3%至 60.8%;P<0.001),而大型城市和小型农村医院在整个大流行期间几乎没有或没有从基线增加转移量。
在整个 COVID-19 大流行期间,研究医院报告称,在每个高浪涌期间,整体患者转移量都出现了反常下降。病例负担紧张的农村(与城市)医院,床位少于 200 张,无法按比例增加转移量。迫切需要关注护理或能力方面转移能力的普遍脆弱性。