Graduate School of Health Sciences, Aomori University of Health and Welfare, Aomori, Japan.
Faculty of Sociology, Aomori University, Aomori, Japan.
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 16;19(2):e0298983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298983. eCollection 2024.
While vaccines are pivotal in combating COVID-19, concerns about side effects and complex procedures have hindered complete vaccination. Prior studies suggest that individuals defaulted to opt-out exhibit higher COVID-19 vaccination rates compared to those in opt-in systems. However, these studies were conducted in countries with a tolerant attitude towards vaccination and default changes, targeting specific age groups, and did not address potential deterrents like the increase in cancellation rates on the day, discomfort towards changing defaults, or the possibility of the opt-out effect being a one-time occurrence. Under the hypothesis that the default nature of the COVID-19 vaccination system influences attitudes towards vaccination even in countries conservative about vaccination and default changes like in Japan, we aimed to examine the differences in the first and second dose vaccination rates, cancellation rates, and the number of complaints between the opt-in and opt-out systems for COVID-19 vaccination. An email survey was conducted in 10 cities in A Prefecture, Japan. The results showed not only higher COVID-19 vaccination rates across all comparable age groups in the opt-out group but also a notably smaller decrease in the second-dose vaccination rate compared to the opt-in group, all achieved without any complaints about the system's introduction. Consequently, it can be inferred that the potential inhibiting factors were largely overcome. Despite some limitations, such as regional specificity, the study suggests that opt-out systems might increase COVID-19 vaccination coverage without leading to significant cancellations or complaints, presenting a promising strategy to facilitate vaccination efforts.
虽然疫苗在抗击 COVID-19 方面至关重要,但人们对副作用和复杂程序的担忧阻碍了完全接种疫苗的进程。先前的研究表明,与选择“加入”系统的人相比,选择“退出”的人新冠疫苗接种率更高。然而,这些研究是在对疫苗接种和默认更改持宽容态度的国家进行的,针对特定年龄组,并且没有解决潜在的阻碍因素,例如当天取消率的增加、对更改默认设置的不适或“退出”效应可能只是一次性的。基于这样的假设,即在像日本这样对疫苗接种和默认更改持保守态度的国家,COVID-19 疫苗接种系统的默认性质会影响人们对疫苗接种的态度,我们旨在研究 COVID-19 疫苗接种的“加入”和“退出”系统在第一剂和第二剂疫苗接种率、取消率和投诉数量方面的差异。我们在日本 A 县的 10 个城市进行了电子邮件调查。结果不仅显示,在“退出”组的所有可比年龄组中,COVID-19 疫苗接种率都更高,而且与“加入”组相比,第二剂疫苗接种率的下降幅度明显更小,而所有这些都没有收到任何关于系统引入的投诉。因此,可以推断出潜在的抑制因素在很大程度上得到了克服。尽管存在一些局限性,例如地域特异性,但该研究表明,“退出”系统可能会提高 COVID-19 疫苗接种覆盖率,而不会导致大量取消或投诉,为促进疫苗接种工作提供了一种有前途的策略。