Mori S, Bertamino M, Guerisoli L, Stratoti S, Canale C, Spallarossa P, Porto I, Ameri P
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Cardiooncology. 2024 Feb 16;10(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40959-024-00207-3.
This article provides an up-to-date overview of pericardial effusion in oncological practice and a guidance on its management. Furthermore, it addresses the question of when malignancy should be suspected in case of newly diagnosed pericardial effusion.
Cancer-related pericardial effusion is commonly the result of localization of lung and breast cancer, melanoma, or lymphoma to the pericardium via direct invasion, lymphatic dissemination, or hematogenous spread. Several cancer therapies may also cause pericardial effusion, most often during or shortly after administration. Pericardial effusion following radiation therapy may instead develop after years. Other diseases, such as infections, and, rarely, primary tumors of the pericardium complete the spectrum of the possible etiologies of pericardial effusion in oncological patients. The diagnosis of cancer-related pericardial effusion is usually incidental, but cancer accounts for approximately one third of all cardiac tamponades. Drainage, which is mainly attained by pericardiocentesis, is needed when cancer or cancer treatment-related pericardial effusion leads to hemodynamic impairment. Placement of a pericardial catheter for 2-5 days is advised after pericardial fluid removal. In contrast, even a large pericardial effusion should be conservatively managed when the patient is stable, although the best frequency and timing of monitoring by echocardiography in this context are yet to be established. Pericardial effusion secondary to immune checkpoint inhibitors typically responds to corticosteroid therapy. Pericardiocentesis may also be considered to confirm the presence of neoplastic cells in the pericardial fluid, but the yield of cytological examination is low. In case of newly found pericardial effusion in individuals without active cancer and/or recent cancer treatment, a history of malignancy, unremitting or recurrent course, large effusion or presentation with cardiac tamponade, incomplete response to empirical therapy with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory, and hemorrhagic fluid at pericardiocentesis suggest a neoplastic etiology.
本文提供了肿瘤学实践中心包积液的最新概述及其管理指南。此外,还探讨了新诊断心包积液时何时应怀疑恶性肿瘤的问题。
癌症相关性心包积液通常是肺癌、乳腺癌、黑色素瘤或淋巴瘤通过直接侵犯、淋巴扩散或血行播散至心包的结果。几种癌症治疗也可能导致心包积液,最常见于给药期间或给药后不久。放射治疗后的心包积液可能在数年之后才出现。其他疾病,如感染,以及罕见的心包原发性肿瘤,构成了肿瘤患者心包积液可能病因的全部范围。癌症相关性心包积液的诊断通常是偶然的,但癌症约占所有心脏压塞病例的三分之一。当癌症或癌症治疗相关性心包积液导致血流动力学损害时,需要进行引流,主要通过心包穿刺术实现。心包积液抽出后,建议放置心包导管2 - 5天。相比之下,当患者病情稳定时,即使是大量心包积液也应采取保守治疗,尽管在此情况下超声心动图监测的最佳频率和时机尚未确定。免疫检查点抑制剂继发的心包积液通常对皮质类固醇治疗有反应。也可考虑进行心包穿刺术以确认心包积液中是否存在肿瘤细胞,但细胞学检查的阳性率较低。在无活动性癌症和/或近期癌症治疗的个体中,新发现心包积液时,有恶性肿瘤病史、病程持续或复发、大量积液或伴有心脏压塞表现、对非甾体抗炎药经验性治疗反应不完全以及心包穿刺抽出血性液体,提示肿瘤性病因。