Suppr超能文献

持有和不持有注册营养师认证的临床营养师在循证实践态度和营养支持指南知识方面的差异。

Evidence-based practice attitudes and nutrition support guideline knowledge between holders and nonholders of the Certified Nutrition Support Clinician credential.

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Preventive Nutrition Sciences, School of Health Professions Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

Nutr Clin Pract. 2024 Aug;39(4):934-944. doi: 10.1002/ncp.11136. Epub 2024 Feb 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice frequently changes, and professionals should stay abreast of evidence-based practice (EBP) guidelines. Negative attitudes towards EBP are a barrier to guideline adoption. This study explored EBP attitudes and knowledge of a complex nutrition support clinical case scenario of individuals holding or not holding the Certified Nutrition Support Clinician (CNSC) credential.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study used an online survey sent to American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) members with and without the CNSC credential and all CNSC credential holders from the National Board of Nutrition Support Certification email list. The survey included the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale Score (EBPAS-15) and eight knowledge questions using a nutrition support case scenario. An independent samples t test compared knowledge and EBPAS-15 total scores and subscores between CNSC holders and nonholders. Pearson correlation determined the correlation between knowledge and EBPAS-15 scores.

RESULTS

The response rate was 7.8% (N = 706). CNSC holders (n = 536) had significantly higher mean knowledge scores (4.7 ± 1.6 out of 8) than nonholders (n = 159, 4.1 ± 1.7) (P < 0.001). Total EBPAS-15 scores were not significantly different between CNSC holders (n = 542, 2.9 ± 0.4 out of 4) and nonholders (n = 164, 2.8 ± 0.7) (P = 0.434), and knowledge scores and total EBPAS-15 scores (P = 0.639) or subscores were not significantly correlated.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of holding the CNSC credential, EBPAS-15 scores indicated respondents had positive EBP attitudes. CNSC holders had significantly higher knowledge scores of recent nutrition support EBP guidelines compared with non-CNSC credential holders. Positive EBP attitudes are a precursor to clinical decision-making, but future research should determine the use of guidelines in clinical practice.

摘要

背景

临床实践经常发生变化,专业人员应紧跟循证实践 (EBP) 指南。对 EBP 的负面态度是采用指南的障碍。本研究探讨了持有或不持有注册营养师 (CNSC) 证书的个体对复杂营养支持临床病例的 EBP 态度和知识。

方法

本横断面研究使用在线调查,向美国肠外和肠内营养学会 (ASPEN) 成员发送了调查,包括持有和不持有 CNSC 证书的成员,以及国家营养支持认证委员会电子邮件列表中的所有 CNSC 证书持有者。该调查包括循证实践态度量表评分 (EBPAS-15) 和使用营养支持病例的 8 个知识问题。独立样本 t 检验比较了 CNSC 持有者和非持有者之间的知识和 EBPAS-15 总分和子分数。Pearson 相关确定了知识和 EBPAS-15 分数之间的相关性。

结果

回复率为 7.8%(N=706)。CNSC 持有者(n=536)的平均知识得分(8 分中的 4.7±1.6)明显高于非持有者(n=159,4.1±1.7)(P<0.001)。CNSC 持有者(n=542,4 分中的 2.9±0.4)和非持有者(n=164,4 分中的 2.8±0.7)之间的总 EBPAS-15 评分没有显著差异(P=0.434),知识得分和总 EBPAS-15 评分(P=0.639)或子分数也没有显著相关性。

结论

无论是否持有 CNSC 证书,EBPAS-15 评分均表明受访者具有积极的 EBP 态度。CNSC 持有者对近期营养支持 EBP 指南的知识得分明显高于非 CNSC 证书持有者。积极的 EBP 态度是临床决策的前提,但未来的研究应该确定指南在临床实践中的应用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验