Suppr超能文献

卵巢反应不良患者黄体期刺激与卵泡期刺激的比较:一项单盲随机对照试验

Comparison of luteal phase stimulation with follicular phase stimulation in poor ovarian response: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Dastjerdi Mozhgan Vahabi, Ansaripour Soheila, Ataei Mina, Gharedaghi Roya, Hoseini Seyedeh Melika Mostafavi, Mohazzab Arash, Zafardoust Simin

机构信息

Reproductive Biotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Social Determinants of Health, Research Center, School of Medical Sciences, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.

出版信息

Contracept Reprod Med. 2024 Feb 18;9(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40834-024-00265-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the last decade, luteal-phase ovarian stimulation (LPOS) has been suggested as an alternative controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles mainly in women with a history of poor ovarian response (POR). The present randomized controlled trial study aimed to compare the outcomes of follicular phase ovarian stimulation (FPOS) and LPOS protocols in POR cases undergoing ICSI cycles.

METHODS

Seventy-eight POR patients who met the Bologna criteria and underwent an ICSI cycle were included. In this study, 39 POR cases were allocated to the FPOS group, and 39 POR cases were allocated to the LPOS group. The primary outcome was the number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes. In addition, the total number of oocytes, number of top-quality day 3 embryo, day 3 embryo development rate, chemical pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates were defined as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

The obtained results demonstrated that the number of MII oocytes significantly increased in the LPOS group compared to the FPOS group (P = 0.007). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the number of GV and MI oocytes, number of top-quality day 3 embryos and day 3 embryo development rate among both categories of patients. Also, the number of total and MII oocytes was significantly higher in the LPOS group (P = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that LPOS protocol effectively increases the number of mature oocytes in women with a history of POR.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

IRCT20210405050852N1 (Registered at Iranian registry of clinical trials; available at https://en.irct.ir/trial/55402 ).

摘要

背景

在过去十年中,黄体期卵巢刺激(LPOS)已被建议作为体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射(IVF/ICSI)周期中一种替代的控制性卵巢刺激(COS)方案,主要用于有卵巢反应不良(POR)病史的女性。本随机对照试验旨在比较POR病例在ICSI周期中卵泡期卵巢刺激(FPOS)和LPOS方案的结局。

方法

纳入78例符合博洛尼亚标准并接受ICSI周期的POR患者。本研究中,39例POR病例被分配到FPOS组,39例POR病例被分配到LPOS组。主要结局是中期II(MII)卵母细胞的数量。此外,卵母细胞总数、优质第3天胚胎数量、第3天胚胎发育率、化学妊娠率和临床妊娠率被定义为次要结局。

结果

获得的结果表明,与FPOS组相比,LPOS组的MII卵母细胞数量显著增加(P = 0.007)。然而,两组在GV和MI卵母细胞数量、两类患者中优质第3天胚胎数量和第3天胚胎发育率方面没有显著差异。此外,LPOS组的总卵母细胞和MII卵母细胞数量显著更高(P = 0.016)。

结论

这些结果表明,LPOS方案可有效增加有POR病史女性的成熟卵母细胞数量。

试验注册

IRCT20210405050852N1(在伊朗临床试验注册中心注册;可在https://en.irct.ir/trial/55402获取)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae89/10874545/fe542f83c5e0/40834_2024_265_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验