Suppr超能文献

比较肝切除术和射频消融术在早期肝细胞癌患者长期生存中的疗效:随机试验和高质量倾向评分匹配研究的荟萃分析。

Comparison of liver resection and radiofrequency ablation in long-term survival among patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized trials and high-quality propensity score-matched studies.

机构信息

Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai, Zhejiang, China.

Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Taizhou Enze Medical Center (Group), Enze Hospital, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb 19;22(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03330-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whether radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and liver resection (LR) are comparable treatments for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is controversial. We conducted this study to provide ample clinical evidence for the argument.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity score-matched (PSM) studies that compared long-term outcomes of both RFA and LR for patients with early-stage HCC. The hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies consisting of six RCTs and 30 PSM studies were included in this study, and a total of 7384 patients were involved, with 3694 patients being treated with LR and 3690 patients with RFA. Meta-analysis showed that LR provided better OS and DFS than RFA (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.13-1.31; HR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.39-1.74, respectively). A sensitivity analysis indicated that the results were stable. For the subgroup of patients with BCLC 0 stage, RFA and LR resulted in similar OS and DFS. For the subgroup of patients with single tumor sizes less than 3 cm, RFA reached similar OS (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.90-1.58) but worse DFS compared with LR (HR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.11-1.90). For the subgroup of ablation margin larger than 0.5 cm, LR still resulted in better OS than RFA (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.09-1.53); while the ablation margin was larger than 1 cm, both RFA and LR resulted in similar OS. The modality of RFA was also a factor that affected results. Subgroup analysis showed that patients receiving ultrasound-guided RFA had worse OS and DFS than LR (HR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.14-1.36; HR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.25-1.66, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Meta-analysis showed that LR provided better OS and DFS for patients with early-stage HCC. However, RFA and LR had similar effects on long-term survival in patients with BCLC 0 stage HCC. RFA and LR probably had similar effects on OS in patients with solitary HCC less than 3 cm or when the ablation margin was larger than 1 cm which need more studies to confirm. The effects of different modalities of RFA on long-term survival are needed for further assessment.

摘要

背景

射频消融(RFA)和肝切除术(LR)在治疗早期肝细胞癌(HCC)方面是否具有可比性存在争议。我们进行这项研究是为了为这一论点提供充分的临床证据。

方法

系统检索了 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 数据库,以确定比较 RFA 和 LR 治疗早期 HCC 患者长期疗效的随机对照试验(RCT)和倾向评分匹配(PSM)研究。计算总生存(OS)和无病生存(DFS)的风险比(HR)及其 95%置信区间(95%CI)。

结果

本研究共纳入 36 项研究,包括 6 项 RCT 和 30 项 PSM 研究,共纳入 7384 例患者,其中 3694 例接受 LR 治疗,3690 例接受 RFA 治疗。Meta 分析显示,LR 提供的 OS 和 DFS 优于 RFA(HR:1.22,95%CI:1.13-1.31;HR:1.56,95%CI:1.39-1.74)。敏感性分析表明结果稳定。对于 BCLC 0 期患者亚组,RFA 和 LR 的 OS 和 DFS 相似。对于肿瘤直径小于 3cm 的单病灶患者亚组,RFA 组的 OS 相似(HR:1.19,95%CI:0.90-1.58),但 DFS 较差(HR:1.45,95%CI:1.11-1.90)。对于消融边缘大于 0.5cm 的患者亚组,LR 组的 OS 仍优于 RFA 组(HR:1.29,95%CI:1.09-1.53);而当消融边缘大于 1cm 时,RFA 和 LR 组的 OS 相似。RFA 的方式也是影响结果的一个因素。亚组分析显示,接受超声引导 RFA 的患者 OS 和 DFS 均差于 LR(HR:1.24,95%CI:1.14-1.36;HR:1.44,95%CI:1.25-1.66)。

结论

Meta 分析显示,LR 为早期 HCC 患者提供了更好的 OS 和 DFS。然而,在 BCLC 0 期 HCC 患者中,RFA 和 LR 对长期生存的影响相似。RFA 和 LR 可能对直径小于 3cm 的单发 HCC 或消融边缘大于 1cm 的 HCC 的 OS 有相似的影响,这需要更多的研究来证实。需要进一步评估不同 RFA 方式对长期生存的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d0e/10875898/88aed2e07ab9/12957_2024_3330_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验