Mallet Jasmina, Dondé Clément, Dubertret Caroline, Gorwood Philip
Université Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (INSERM UMR1266), Paris, France.
Department of Psychiatry, AP-HP, Louis Mourier Hospital, Colombes, France.
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2024 Feb 16;14:20451253241231269. doi: 10.1177/20451253241231269. eCollection 2024.
Clinical remission is a step towards functional remission for subjects with schizophrenia. While recovery is both a subjective personal journey and a clinical outcome to be targeted, data on patient self-rated outcomes are scarce.
(i) To determine the extent to which the association between clinical and functional remission is mediated by the subjective experience of recovery as reported by patients their relatives or their psychiatrist and (ii) to assess differences according to treatment, specifically with oral antipsychotics only long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs).
Clinical observational study.
Community-dwelling participants with schizophrenia enrolled in the EGOFORS cohort ( = 198) were included. Clinical symptoms and remission were assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Functional remission was assessed with the Functional Remission of General Schizophrenia Scale. Awareness of recovery was assessed with one question 'What percentage of recovery do you think you have now (from 0% - no recovery - to 100% - full recovery)?', asked of the patient, also of the patient's close relative, and the psychiatrist. We used mediation analyses, taking into account the type of pharmacological treatment.
Remission criteria and perceived remission measures were significantly correlated, both within and between groups ( > 0.330). The patient's awareness of recovery mediated the relationship between clinical remission and level of functional remission, while the level of recovery according to psychiatrists or close relatives did not. The direct effect of clinical remission on the level of functional remission became non-significant when taking into account the mediator (patients' awareness of recovery) in the group of patients with LAI ( = 1.5, = 0.150) but not in the group of patients with other treatments ( = 3.1, = 0.003).
Patients with LAIs may be more efficient in reporting their level of functional remission. Higher patient awareness could be an interesting candidate to explain this. However, as the study was cross-sectional, such a proposal should be tested with a more specifically designed protocol, such as a long-term cohort.
临床缓解是精神分裂症患者走向功能缓解的一个阶段。虽然康复既是个人主观的历程,也是一个需要达成的临床结果,但关于患者自评结果的数据却很匮乏。
(i)确定临床缓解与功能缓解之间的关联在多大程度上由患者、其亲属或精神科医生报告的康复主观体验所介导,以及(ii)评估不同治疗方式之间的差异,特别是仅使用口服抗精神病药物与长效注射用抗精神病药物(LAIs)之间的差异。
临床观察性研究。
纳入参与EGOFORS队列研究的198名社区居住的精神分裂症患者。使用阳性和阴性症状量表评估临床症状和缓解情况。使用精神分裂症总体功能缓解量表评估功能缓解情况。通过向患者、其近亲以及精神科医生询问一个问题“您认为您目前的康复程度是多少(从0% - 未康复 - 到100% - 完全康复)?”来评估康复意识。我们采用中介分析,并考虑了药物治疗的类型。
缓解标准与感知到的缓解指标在组内和组间均显著相关(> 0.330)。患者的康复意识介导了临床缓解与功能缓解水平之间的关系,而精神科医生或近亲所认为的康复水平则没有。在使用LAIs的患者组中,考虑到中介变量(患者的康复意识)时,临床缓解对功能缓解水平的直接效应变得不显著(β = 1.5,p = 0.150),但在接受其他治疗的患者组中并非如此(β = 3.1,p = 0.003)。
使用LAIs的患者在报告其功能缓解水平方面可能更有效。患者更高的意识可能是解释这一现象的一个有趣因素。然而,由于该研究是横断面研究,这样的提议应该通过更专门设计的方案进行测试,例如长期队列研究。