Pérez-Blanco Lucía, Felpete-López Alba, Nieto-Vieites Ana, Lojo-Seoane Cristina, Campos-Magdaleno María, Fernández-Feijoo Fátima, Juncos-Rabadán Onésimo, Pereiro Arturo X
Department of Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Applied Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychogerontology Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2024 Feb 2;16:1319743. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1319743. eCollection 2024.
To analyze the validity of self and informant reports, depressive symptomatology, and some sociodemographic variables to predict the risk of cognitive decline at different follow-up times.
A total of 337 participants over 50 years of age included in the CompAS and classified as Cognitively Unimpaired (CU), Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) groups were assessed at baseline and three follow-ups. A short version of the QAM was administered to assess the severity of subjective cognitive complaints (SCCs), and the GDS-15 was used to evaluate the depressive symptoms. At each follow-up assessment, participants were reclassified according to the stability, regression or progression of their conditions. Logistic regression analysis was used to predict which CU, SCD and MCI participants would remain stable, regress or progress at a 3rd follow-up by using self- and informant-reported complaints, depressive symptomatology, age and education at baseline and 2nd follow-ups as the predictive variables.
Overall, self-reported complaints predicted progression between the asymptomatic and presymptomatic stages. As the objective deterioration increased, i.e., when SCD progressed to MCI or dementia, the SCCs reported by informants proved the best predictors of progression. Depressive symptomatology was also a predictor of progression from CU to SCD and from SCD to MCI.
A late increase in self-reported complaints make valid estimates to predict subjective decline at asymptomatic stages. However, an early increase in complaints reported by informants was more accurate in predicting objective decline from asymptomatic stages. Both, early and late decrease in self-reported complaints successfully predict dementia from prodromic stage. Only late decrease in self-reported complaints predict reversion from prodromic and pre-symptomatic stages.
分析自我报告和知情者报告、抑郁症状以及一些社会人口学变量在不同随访时间预测认知能力下降风险的有效性。
共有337名50岁以上纳入CompAS研究的参与者,分为认知未受损(CU)、主观认知下降(SCD)和轻度认知障碍(MCI)组,在基线和三次随访时进行评估。采用QAM简版评估主观认知主诉(SCCs)的严重程度,使用GDS-15评估抑郁症状。在每次随访评估时,根据参与者病情的稳定、逆转或进展情况重新分类。采用逻辑回归分析,以自我报告和知情者报告的主诉、抑郁症状、基线时以及第二次随访时的年龄和教育程度作为预测变量,预测哪些CU、SCD和MCI参与者在第三次随访时会保持稳定、逆转或进展。
总体而言,自我报告的主诉可预测无症状和症状前期之间的进展。随着客观衰退的增加,即当SCD进展为MCI或痴呆时,知情者报告的SCCs被证明是进展的最佳预测指标。抑郁症状也是从CU进展为SCD以及从SCD进展为MCI的预测指标。
自我报告主诉的后期增加能有效预测无症状阶段的主观衰退。然而,知情者报告主诉的早期增加在预测无症状阶段的客观衰退方面更准确。自我报告主诉的早期和后期减少都能成功预测前驱期的痴呆。只有自我报告主诉的后期减少能预测从前驱期和症状前期的逆转。