Community Medicine and Health Care, School of Medicine, UConn Health, Farmington, CT, United States of America.
School of Medicine, Medical Sciences, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, CT, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 23;19(2):e0297681. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297681. eCollection 2024.
We examined household food insecurity (HFI) and autonomic nervous system (ANS) function in a subset of low-income Latinos with type 2 diabetes with data from a stress management trial.
InclusionLatino or Hispanic, Spanish speaking, age less than 18 years, ambulatory status, type 2 diabetes more than 6 months, A1c less than 7.0%. ExclusionPain or dysfunction in hands (e.g., arthritis) precluding handgrip testing; medical or psychiatric instability. HFI was assessed with the 6-item U.S. household food security survey module; with responses to > = 1 question considered HFI. An ANS dysfunction index was calculated from xix autonomic function tests which were scored 0 = normal or 1 = abnormal based on normative cutoffs and then summed. Autonomic function tests were: 1) 24-hour heart rate variability as reflected in standard deviation of the normal-to-normal (SDNN) heart rate acquired with 3-channel, 7-lead ambulatory electrocardiogram (Holter) monitors; 2) difference between the highest diastolic blood pressure (DBP) during sustained handgrip and the average DBP at rest; 3) difference between baseline supine and the minimal BP after standing up; and, from 24-hour urine specimens 4) cortisol, 5) normetanephrine, and, 6) metanephrine.
Thirty-five individuals participated, 23 (65.7%) of them were women, age mean = 61.6 (standard deviation = 11.2) years, HbA1c mean = 8.5% (standard deviation = 1.6) and 20 participants (57.1%) used insulin. Twenty-two participants (62.9%) reported HFI and 25 (71.4%) had one or more abnormal ANS measure. Independent t-tests showed that participants with HFI had a higher ANS dysfunction index (mean = 1.5, standard deviation = 0.9) than patients who were food secure (mean = 0.7, standard deviation = 0.8), p = 0.02. Controlling for financial strain did not change significance. Total ANS index was not related to glycemia, insulin use or other socioeconomic indicators. In this sample, HFI was associated with ANS dysfunction. Policies to improve food access and affordability may benefit health outcomes for Latinos with diabetes.
我们利用压力管理试验的数据,在一组患有 2 型糖尿病的低收入拉丁裔人群中,检查家庭食物不安全(HFI)与自主神经系统(ANS)功能之间的关系。
纳入标准:拉丁裔或西班牙裔,西班牙语使用者,年龄小于 18 岁,能走动,2 型糖尿病超过 6 个月,A1c 小于 7.0%。排除标准:手部疼痛或功能障碍(例如关节炎),妨碍握力测试;有医疗或精神不稳定病史。使用美国家庭食物安全调查模块的 6 项来评估 HFI;对超过 = 1 个问题的回答被认为是 HFI。从 19 项自主功能测试中计算出 ANS 功能障碍指数,根据正常的参考值和切分点,将每项测试的结果分为 0 = 正常或 1 = 异常,然后将它们相加。自主功能测试包括:1)24 小时心率变异性,反映在通过 3 通道、7 导联动态心电图(动态心电图)监测器获得的正常到正常(SDNN)心率的标准差中;2)持续握力时最高舒张压(DBP)与休息时平均 DBP 之间的差异;3)从卧位到站立后最小血压的差异;以及,从 24 小时尿液标本中:4)皮质醇,5)去甲变肾上腺素,和 6)变肾上腺素。
35 名参与者参与了研究,其中 23 名(65.7%)为女性,年龄平均为 61.6(标准差为 11.2)岁,HbA1c 平均为 8.5%(标准差为 1.6%),20 名参与者(57.1%)使用胰岛素。22 名参与者(62.9%)报告有 HFI,25 名参与者(71.4%)有一项或多项异常的 ANS 测量。独立 t 检验显示,有 HFI 的参与者的 ANS 功能障碍指数较高(均值 = 1.5,标准差 = 0.9),而无 HFI 的参与者的 ANS 功能障碍指数较低(均值 = 0.7,标准差 = 0.8),p = 0.02。控制经济压力后,结果仍然具有统计学意义。总 ANS 指数与血糖、胰岛素使用或其他社会经济指标无关。在这个样本中,HFI 与 ANS 功能障碍有关。改善食物获取和负担能力的政策可能有益于糖尿病拉丁裔人群的健康结果。