Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L7 8TX, UK.
Age Ageing. 2024 Feb 1;53(2). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae021.
The Atrial fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway is the gold-standard approach to atrial fibrillation (AF) management, but the effect of implementation on health outcomes in care home residents is unknown.
To examine associations between ABC pathway adherence and stroke, transient ischaemic attack, cardiovascular hospitalisation, major bleeding, mortality and a composite of all these outcomes in care home residents.
A retrospective cohort study of older care home residents (≥65 years) in Wales with AF was conducted between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2018 using the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage Databank. Adherence to the ABC pathway was assessed at care home entry using pre-specified definitions. Cox proportional hazard and competing risk models were used to estimate the risk of health outcomes according to ABC adherence.
From 14,493 residents (median [interquartile range] age 87.0 [82.6-91.2] years, 35.2% male) with AF, 5,531 (38.2%) were ABC pathway adherent. Pathway adherence was not significantly associated with risk of the composite outcome (adjusted hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01 [0.97-1.05]). There was a significant independent association observed between ABC pathway adherence and a reduced risk of myocardial infarction (0.70 [0.50-0.98]), but a higher risk of haemorrhagic stroke (1.59 [1.06-2.39]). ABC pathway adherence was not significantly associated with any other individual health outcomes examined.
An ABC adherent approach in care home residents was not consistently associated with improved health outcomes. Findings should be interpreted with caution owing to difficulties in defining pathway adherence using routinely collected data and an individualised approach is recommended.
心房颤动更好的护理(ABC)途径是心房颤动(AF)管理的金标准方法,但实施该途径对护理院居民健康结果的影响尚不清楚。
检查 ABC 途径依从性与护理院居民中风、短暂性脑缺血发作、心血管住院、大出血、死亡以及所有这些结果的综合结局之间的关联。
这是一项在威尔士的老年护理院居民(≥65 岁)中进行的回顾性队列研究,该研究于 2003 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间使用安全匿名信息链接数据库进行。在入住护理院时使用预先确定的定义评估 ABC 途径的依从性。使用 Cox 比例风险和竞争风险模型根据 ABC 依从性估计健康结果的风险。
从 14493 名患有 AF 的居民(中位数[四分位距]年龄 87.0[82.6-91.2]岁,35.2%为男性)中,有 5531 名(38.2%)为 ABC 途径依从者。途径依从性与复合结局的风险无显著相关性(调整后的危险比,95%置信区间[CI]:1.01[0.97-1.05])。观察到 ABC 途径依从性与心肌梗死风险降低显著相关(0.70[0.50-0.98]),但与出血性中风风险增加相关(1.59[1.06-2.39])。ABC 途径依从性与研究中检查的其他任何单一健康结果均无显著相关性。
在护理院居民中采用 ABC 依从性方法并不总是与改善健康结果相关。鉴于使用常规收集的数据定义途径依从性存在困难,并且建议采用个体化方法,因此应谨慎解释这些发现。