Carney Institute for Brain Science, Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, & Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Center for Depression, Anxiety and Stress Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2024 Jul;9(7):726-736. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.02.005. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
Deeper phenotyping may improve our understanding of depression. Because depression is heterogeneous, extracting cognitive signatures associated with severity of depressive symptoms, anhedonia, and affective states is a promising approach.
Sequential sampling models decomposed behavior from an adaptive approach-avoidance conflict task into computational parameters quantifying latent cognitive signatures. Fifty unselected participants completed clinical scales and the approach-avoidance conflict task by either approaching or avoiding trials offering monetary rewards and electric shocks.
Decision dynamics were best captured by a sequential sampling model with linear collapsing boundaries varying by net offer values, and with drift rates varying by trial-specific reward and aversion, reflecting net evidence accumulation toward approach or avoidance. Unlike conventional behavioral measures, these computational parameters revealed distinct associations with self-reported symptoms. Specifically, passive avoidance tendencies, indexed by starting point biases, were associated with greater severity of depressive symptoms (R = 0.34, p = .019) and anhedonia (R = 0.49, p = .001). Depressive symptoms were also associated with slower encoding and response execution, indexed by nondecision time (R = 0.37, p = .011). Higher reward sensitivity for offers with negative net values, indexed by drift rates, was linked to more sadness (R = 0.29, p = .042) and lower positive affect (R = -0.33, p = .022). Conversely, higher aversion sensitivity was associated with more tension (R = 0.33, p = .025). Finally, less cautious response patterns, indexed by boundary separation, were linked to more negative affect (R = -0.40, p = .005).
We demonstrated the utility of multidimensional computational phenotyping, which could be applied to clinical samples to improve characterization and treatment selection.
更深入的表型分析可能会增进我们对抑郁症的理解。由于抑郁症具有异质性,因此提取与抑郁症状严重程度、快感缺失和情感状态相关的认知特征是一种很有前途的方法。
采用序列抽样模型将自适应趋近回避冲突任务中的行为分解为量化潜在认知特征的计算参数。50 名未经选择的参与者通过趋近或回避提供金钱奖励和电击的试验完成临床量表和趋近回避冲突任务。
决策动态最好由一个具有线性折叠边界的序列抽样模型来捕捉,该模型的边界值随净报价值而变化,漂移率随特定试验的奖励和厌恶而变化,反映了朝着趋近或回避的净证据积累。与传统的行为测量不同,这些计算参数与自我报告的症状有明显的关联。具体来说,由起始点偏差表示的被动回避倾向与抑郁症状严重程度(R=0.34,p=0.019)和快感缺失(R=0.49,p=0.001)呈正相关。抑郁症状也与较慢的编码和反应执行有关,由非决策时间表示(R=0.37,p=0.011)。对具有负净值的报价的较高奖励敏感性,由漂移率表示,与更多的悲伤(R=0.29,p=0.042)和较低的正性情绪(R=-0.33,p=0.022)有关。相反,较高的厌恶敏感性与更多的紧张有关(R=0.33,p=0.025)。最后,由边界分离表示的不谨慎反应模式与更多的负性情绪有关(R=-0.40,p=0.005)。
我们证明了多维计算表型分析的实用性,它可以应用于临床样本,以改善特征描述和治疗选择。