Chanthavisouk Phonsuda, Ingleshwar Aparna, Theis-Mahon Nicole, Paulson Danna R
Division of Dental Therapy, Department of Primary Dental Care, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Department of Diagnostic & Biological Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2024 Jan;24(1S):101949. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2023.101949. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) is pivotal in patient care, reflecting oral health through dental patient-reported outcomes (dPROs). This systematic review aims to outline the 4-dimensional (4-D) impact of OHRQoL within patient populations routinely treated by dental hygiene and/or dental therapy providers, as there is limited literature present for these oral health care professionals.
The study extracted and analyzed characteristics and multidimensional impact of OHRQoL, using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) as the primary dental patient-reported outcome measure (dPROM). The search strategy spanned 7 databases: Medline via the Ovid interface (Ovid MEDLINE(R) ALL), Embase via Ovid, Cinahl, APA PsycINFO via Ovid, Dentistry and Oral Sciences Search, Scopus, and Web of Science (Core Collection). It commenced September 2, 2022, with a refinement search on July 5, 2023. English language criteria yielded 645 articles postduplication removal. A screening procedure involving 3 reviewers encompassed title, abstract, and full-text review.
After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 5 articles were subjected to data extraction, capturing domain-specific information including baseline and follow-up OHRQoL data. An additional set of 13 articles containing summarized OHRQoL data underwent separate analysis. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools were utilized for risk bias assessment of the included articles. The 4-D impact scores reported for baseline OHRQoL data, ranged from 3.10 to 4.20 for Oral Function, 0.84-2.70 for Orofacial Pain, 1.70-4.50 for Orofacial Appearance, and 0.44-2.50 for Psychosocial Impact. In follow-up OHRQoL data, the range for Oral Function was 1.52-3.60, Orofacial Pain 0.60-2.10, Orofacial Appearance 0.91-2.25, and Psychosocial Impact 0.10-0.60.
This review highlights a critical call for standardization in OHRQoL data collection for dental hygiene and dental therapy patient populations as only 26% of the predetermined distinct populations were found to have studies completed with 4-D impact of OHRQoL. Moreover, the presence of limited research in describing the multi-dimensional impact in patients routinely treated by these providers shows the urgency of substantive research in this area.
口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)在患者护理中至关重要,通过牙科患者报告结局(dPROs)反映口腔健康状况。本系统评价旨在概述OHRQoL在牙科保健和/或牙科治疗提供者常规治疗的患者群体中的四维(4-D)影响,因为针对这些口腔保健专业人员的文献有限。
本研究提取并分析了OHRQoL的特征和多维影响,使用口腔健康影响量表(OHIP)作为主要的牙科患者报告结局指标(dPROM)。检索策略涵盖7个数据库:通过Ovid界面的Medline(Ovid MEDLINE(R) ALL)、通过Ovid的Embase、Cinahl、通过Ovid的APA PsycINFO、牙科与口腔科学搜索、Scopus和科学网(核心合集)。检索于2022年9月2日开始,并于2023年7月5日进行了精确检索。根据英语语言标准,去除重复文章后得到645篇文章。由3名评审员进行的筛选程序包括标题、摘要和全文评审。
应用纳入和排除标准后,对5篇文章进行了数据提取,获取了包括基线和随访OHRQoL数据在内的特定领域信息。另外13篇包含OHRQoL汇总数据的文章进行了单独分析。使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(JBI)的批判性评价工具对纳入文章进行风险偏倚评估。报告的基线OHRQoL数据的4-D影响得分中,口腔功能为3.10至4.20,口面部疼痛为0.84至2.70,口面部外观为1.70至4.50,心理社会影响为0.44至2.50。在随访OHRQoL数据中,口腔功能的范围为1.52至3.60,口面部疼痛为0.60至2.10,口面部外观为0.91至2.25,心理社会影响为0.10至0.60。
本综述强调了对牙科保健和牙科治疗患者群体的OHRQoL数据收集进行标准化的迫切需求,因为仅发现26%的预定不同人群完成了关于OHRQoL的4-D影响的研究。此外,在描述这些提供者常规治疗的患者的多维影响方面研究有限,这表明该领域进行实质性研究的紧迫性。