Neitz Jay, Neitz Maureen
University of Washington, Department of Ophthalmology, 750 Republican St., Seattle, WA 98102, USA.
Biomed Opt Express. 2024 Jan 16;15(2):789-792. doi: 10.1364/BOE.504315. eCollection 2024 Feb 1.
We are writing to address errors of misrepresentation in the article "ON and OFF receptive field processing in the presence of optical scattering" [Biomed. Opt. Express14, 2618 (2023)10.1364/BOE.489117]. In their investigation of predictions of "contrast theory" to explain the efficacy of diffusion optics technology (DOT), a myopia control lens design [Br. J. Ophthalmol.107, 1709 (2023)10.1136/bjo-2021-321005], Breher et al. incorrectly indicated that our contrast theory proposed that the association between cone opsin gene splicing defects and myopia was due to differential involvement in ON- and OFF-visual pathways. In addition, the Authors write that we have "hypothesized enhanced ON contrast sensitivity in myopes," but we predict the opposite.
我们特此致信,以纠正《存在光学散射时的开与关感受野处理》[《生物医学光学快报》14, 2618 (2023)10.1364/BOE.489117]一文中的失实陈述错误。在他们对“对比度理论”预测的研究中,该理论用于解释扩散光学技术(DOT)的功效,即一种近视控制镜片设计[《英国眼科杂志》107, 1709 (2023)10.1136/bjo - 2021 - 321005],布雷赫尔等人错误地指出,我们的对比度理论提出视锥蛋白基因剪接缺陷与近视之间的关联是由于在开视觉通路和关视觉通路中的不同参与情况。此外,作者写道我们“假设近视患者的开对比度敏感性增强”,但我们的预测恰恰相反。