Suppr超能文献

用于改良型气泡持续气道正压通气(CPAP)回路的新型低成本夹带注射器系统(LESS)混合器:安全性临床研究

The novel LESS (low-cost entrainment syringe system) O blender for use in modified bubble CPAP circuits: a clinical study of safety.

作者信息

Wu Andrew G, Luch Sreyleak, Slusher Tina M, Fischer Gwenyth A, Lunos Scott A, Bjorklund Ashley R

机构信息

Division of Critical Care Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

出版信息

Front Pediatr. 2024 Feb 12;12:1313781. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1313781. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bubble continuous positive airway pressure (bCPAP) is used in resource-limited settings for children with respiratory distress. Low-cost modifications of bCPAP use 100% oxygen and may cause morbidity from oxygen toxicity. We sought to test a novel constructible low-cost entrainment syringe system (LESS) oxygen blender with low-cost modified bCPAP in a relevant clinical setting.

METHODS

We conducted a clinical trial evaluating safety of the LESS O blender among hospitalized children under five years old in rural Cambodia evaluating the rate of clinical failure within one hour of initiation of the LESS O blender and monitoring for any other blender-related complications.

FINDINGS

Thirty-two patients were included. The primary outcome (clinical failure) occurred in one patient (3.1%, 95% CI = 0.1-16.2%). Clinical failure was defined as intubation, death, transfer to another hospital, or two of the following: oxygen saturation <85% after 30 min of treatment; new signs of respiratory distress; or partial pressure of carbon dioxide ≥60 mmHg and pH <7.2 on a capillary blood gas. Secondary outcomes included average generated FiO's with blender use, which were 59% and 52% when a 5 mm entrainment was used vs. a 10 mm entrainment port with 5-7 cm HO of CPAP and 1-7 L/min (LPM) of flow; and adverse events including loss of CPAP bubbling (64% of all adverse events), frequency of repair or adjustment (44%), replacement (25%), and median time of respiratory support (44 h).

INTERPRETATION

Overall the LESS O blender was safe for clinical use. The design could be modified for improved performance including less repair needs and improved nasal interface, which requires modification for the blender to function more consistently.

摘要

背景

气泡持续气道正压通气(bCPAP)用于资源有限地区呼吸窘迫的儿童。低成本的bCPAP改良装置使用100%氧气,可能会因氧中毒导致发病。我们试图在相关临床环境中测试一种新型可构建的低成本夹带注射器系统(LESS)氧气混合器与低成本改良bCPAP。

方法

我们进行了一项临床试验,评估柬埔寨农村地区五岁以下住院儿童中LESS O混合器的安全性,评估启动LESS O混合器后一小时内的临床失败率,并监测任何其他与混合器相关的并发症。

结果

纳入32例患者。主要结局(临床失败)发生在1例患者中(3.1%,95%CI = 0.1 - 16.2%)。临床失败定义为插管、死亡、转至另一家医院,或以下情况中的两种:治疗30分钟后氧饱和度<85%;新出现的呼吸窘迫体征;或毛细血管血气分析中二氧化碳分压≥60 mmHg且pH<7.2。次要结局包括使用混合器时产生的平均吸入氧浓度(FiO),当使用5毫米夹带与使用10毫米夹带端口且CPAP为5 - 7厘米水柱和流量为1 - 7升/分钟(LPM)时,分别为59%和52%;不良事件包括CPAP气泡消失(占所有不良事件的64%)、维修或调整频率(44%)、更换(25%)以及呼吸支持的中位时间(44小时)。

解读

总体而言,LESS O混合器临床使用安全。其设计可进行修改以提高性能,包括减少维修需求和改进鼻接口,这需要对混合器进行修改以使功能更稳定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a66f/10894966/44a0c80f0ab8/fped-12-1313781-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验