Söğüt Muhammet Selman, Darçın Kamil, Karakaya Muhammet Ahmet, Manici Mete, Gürkan Yavuz
Koç University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, İstanbul, Turkey.
Acıbadem Ataşehir Hospital, Clinic of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, İstanbul, Turkey.
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2024 Feb 28;52(1):8-13. doi: 10.4274/TJAR.2024.231452.
For patient safety, maintaining hemodynamic stability during surgical procedures is critical. Dynamic indices [such as systolic pressure variation (SPV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV)], have recently seen an increase in use. Given the risks associated with such invasive techniques, there is growing interest in non-invasive monitoring methods-and plethysmographic waveform analysis. However, many such non-invasive methods involve intricate calculations or brand-specific monitors. This study introduces the simple systolic ratio (SSR), derived from pulse oximetry tracings, as a non-invasive method to assess fluid responsiveness.
This prospective observational study included 25 adult patients whose SPV, PPV, and SSR values were collected at 30-min intervals during open abdominal surgery. The SSR was defined as the ratio of the tallest waveform to the shortest waveform within pulse tracings. The correlations among SSR, SPV, and PPV were analyzed. Additionally, anaesthesia specialists visually assessed pulse oximetry tracings to determine fluid responsiveness using the SSR method.
Strong correlations were observed between SSR and both SPV (r = 0.715, < 0.001) and PPV (r = 0.702, < 0.001). Receiver operator curve analysis identified optimal SSR thresholds for predicting fluid responsiveness at 1.47 for SPV and 1.50 for PPV. A survey of anaesthesia specialists using the SSR method to visually assess fluid responsiveness produced an accuracy rate of 83%.
Based on the strong correlations it exhibits with traditional markers, SSR has great potential as a clinical tool, especially in resource-limited settings. However, further research is needed to establish its role, especially as it pertains to its universal applicability across monitoring devices.
为确保患者安全,在外科手术过程中维持血流动力学稳定至关重要。动态指标[如收缩压变异(SPV)和脉压变异(PPV)]的应用近来有所增加。鉴于此类侵入性技术存在风险,人们对非侵入性监测方法——以及容积描记波形分析的兴趣与日俱增。然而,许多此类非侵入性方法涉及复杂的计算或特定品牌的监测仪。本研究引入了源自脉搏血氧饱和度描记图的简单收缩压比值(SSR),作为一种评估液体反应性的非侵入性方法。
这项前瞻性观察性研究纳入了25例成年患者,在开腹手术期间每隔30分钟收集其SPV、PPV和SSR值。SSR定义为脉搏描记图中最高波形与最短波形的比值。分析了SSR、SPV和PPV之间的相关性。此外,麻醉专科医生通过视觉评估脉搏血氧饱和度描记图,使用SSR方法确定液体反应性。
观察到SSR与SPV(r = 0.715,<0.001)和PPV(r = 0.702,<0.001)之间均存在强相关性。受试者工作特征曲线分析确定,预测液体反应性的最佳SSR阈值对于SPV为1.47,对于PPV为1.50。一项针对麻醉专科医生使用SSR方法进行液体反应性视觉评估的调查显示,准确率为83%。
基于SSR与传统指标之间呈现的强相关性,它作为一种临床工具具有巨大潜力,尤其是在资源有限的环境中。然而,需要进一步研究来确立其作用,特别是其在各种监测设备上的普遍适用性。