Suppr超能文献

急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死与非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的血管紧张素受体-脑啡肽酶抑制剂治疗。

Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition in Patients With STEMI vs NSTEMI.

机构信息

Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.

The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Mar 5;83(9):904-914. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.01.002.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients who sustain an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), including ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), remain at high risk for heart failure (HF), coronary events, and death. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been shown to significantly decrease the risk for cardiovascular events in both STEMI and NSTEMI patients.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to determine whether angiotensin-receptor blockade and neprilysin inhibition with sacubitril/valsartan, compared with ramipril, has impact on reducing cardiovascular events according to the type of AMI.

METHODS

The PARADISE-MI (Prospective ARNI versus ACE inhibitor trial to DetermIne Superiority in reducing heart failure Events after Myocardial Infarction) trial enrolled patients with AMI complicated by left ventricular dysfunction and/or pulmonary congestion and at least 1 risk-enhancing factor. Patients were randomized to either sacubitril/valsartan or ramipril. The primary endpoint was death from cardiovascular causes or incident HF. In this prespecified analysis, we stratified patients according to AMI type.

RESULTS

Of 5,661 enrolled patients, 4,291 (75.8%) had STEMI. These patients were younger and had fewer comorbidities and cardiovascular risk factors than NSTEMI patients. After adjustment for potential confounders, the risk for the primary outcome was marginally higher in NSTEMI vs STEMI patients (adjusted HR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.00-1.41), with borderline statistical significance (P = 0.05). The primary composite outcome occurred at similar rates in patients randomized to sacubitril/valsartan vs ramipril in STEMI (10% vs 12%; HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.73-1.04; P = 0.13) and NSTEMI patients (17% vs 17%; HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.75-1.25; P = 0.80; P interaction = 0.53).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with ramipril, sacubitril/valsartan did not significantly decrease the risk for cardiovascular death and HF in patients with AMI complicated by left ventricular dysfunction, irrespective of the type of AMI. (Prospective ARNI vs ACE Inhibitor Trial to Determine Superiority in Reducing Heart Failure Events After MI; NCT02924727).

摘要

背景

急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者,包括 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)和非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI),仍然存在心力衰竭(HF)、冠状动脉事件和死亡的高风险。血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)已被证明可显著降低 STEMI 和 NSTEMI 患者的心血管事件风险。

目的

本研究旨在确定与雷米普利相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦(ARNI)对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死和非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的心血管事件减少是否具有影响。

方法

PARADISE-MI(前瞻性 ARNI 与 ACEI 抑制剂试验以确定在心肌梗死后降低心力衰竭事件的优越性)试验纳入了伴有左心室功能障碍和/或肺充血以及至少 1 个增强风险因素的 AMI 患者。患者被随机分配至沙库巴曲缬沙坦或雷米普利组。主要终点为心血管原因导致的死亡或心力衰竭事件。在此预先指定的分析中,我们根据 AMI 类型对患者进行分层。

结果

在 5661 名入组患者中,4291 名(75.8%)为 STEMI 患者。与 NSTEMI 患者相比,这些患者更年轻,合并症和心血管危险因素更少。在调整潜在混杂因素后,与 STEMI 患者相比,NSTEMI 患者的主要结局风险略高(调整后的 HR:1.19;95%CI:1.00-1.41),具有边缘统计学意义(P=0.05)。在 STEMI 患者(10% vs 12%;HR:0.87;95%CI:0.73-1.04;P=0.13)和 NSTEMI 患者(17% vs 17%;HR:0.97;95%CI:0.75-1.25;P=0.80;P 交互=0.53)中,随机分配至沙库巴曲缬沙坦与雷米普利的患者主要复合结局发生率相似。

结论

与雷米普利相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦并未显著降低伴有左心室功能障碍的 AMI 患者的心血管死亡和心力衰竭风险,无论 AMI 类型如何。(前瞻性 ARNI 与 ACEI 抑制剂试验以确定在 MI 后降低心力衰竭事件的优越性;NCT02924727)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验