Markowitsch H J, Kessler J, Streicher M
Behav Neurosci. 1985 Apr;99(2):233-56.
The ability of the rat brain to acquire or to retain specific learning tasks was tested under conditions of multiple lesions and widely different amounts of practice. Lesion targets were (a) the medial prefrontal and cingulate cortex, (b) the anterior and mediodorsal thalamus, and (c) the dorsal and ventral hippocampus. Rats were divided into seven groups. The first group received lesions of all three structural complexes prior to training in a delayed alternation and an active avoidance task. Groups 2-4 received lesions in different combinations of two of the three structural complexes prior to task acquisition. Group 5 first learned both tasks and then received the medial cortical lesion; thereafter it was retrained to criterion. Then, the thalamic lesion was made, and relearning was tested a second time. Finally, the hippocampal region was damaged, and a last relearning test was given. Groups 6 and 7 also first acquired both tasks; however, after that, they received 240 (Group 6) or 1,280 (Group 7) trials of overtraining. Following this, all three structural complexes were given lesions serially before relearning of the two tasks was tested. Nine of the ten animals of Group 1 failed to acquire the alternation task, but all learned the avoidance task. In Groups 2-4, all rats acquired both tasks. Postoperatively, rats of Group 5 were inferior to those of Group 6 in both tasks, and rats of Group 7 were the most successful animals of the last three groups. These results question the assumption that serial lesions with intermittent training between lesions have beneficial effects, and they also stress the importance of task practice, that is, of behavioral experience. It is argued that prolonged training will lead to a widely distributed storage of information within the brain. The process of wide diffusion of information will, however, be disturbed (or at least retarded) by lesions made shortly after task acquisition or task reacquisition (as was the case for animals of Group 5).
在多处损伤以及练习量差异极大的条件下,对大鼠大脑获取或保留特定学习任务的能力进行了测试。损伤靶点包括:(a) 内侧前额叶和扣带回皮质;(b) 前丘脑和背内侧丘脑;(c) 背侧和腹侧海马体。大鼠被分为七组。第一组在接受延迟交替和主动回避任务训练前,对所有三个结构复合体进行损伤。第2 - 4组在任务习得前,对三个结构复合体中的两个进行不同组合的损伤。第5组先学习两项任务,然后接受内侧皮质损伤;之后重新训练至标准。接着,进行丘脑损伤,并再次测试重新学习情况。最后,损伤海马区,并进行最后一次重新学习测试。第6组和第7组也先习得两项任务;然而,在此之后,它们分别接受了240次(第6组)或1280次(第7组)的过度训练。在此之后,在测试两项任务的重新学习之前,依次对所有三个结构复合体进行损伤。第1组的十只动物中有九只未能习得交替任务,但都学会了回避任务。在第2 - 4组中,所有大鼠都习得两项任务。术后,第5组大鼠在两项任务上均不如第6组大鼠,而第7组大鼠是最后三组中最成功的。这些结果对损伤之间进行间歇训练的系列损伤具有有益效果这一假设提出了质疑,同时也强调了任务练习即行为经验的重要性。有人认为,长时间训练会导致信息在大脑内广泛分布存储。然而,信息广泛扩散的过程会因在任务习得或重新习得后不久进行的损伤(如第5组动物的情况)而受到干扰(或至少受到阻碍)。