Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Institute of Farm and Agricultural Sciences, Statistics Consulting Unit, University of Florida, Florida, USA.
Vet Surg. 2024 May;53(4):733-741. doi: 10.1111/vsu.14082. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
To compare time to construct completion and leak testing between hand-sewn and skin staple anastomoses and enterotomies in cats.
Ex vivo, randomized study.
Fresh feline cadavers (n = 20).
Jejunal segments (8 cm) were harvested and tested on the same day as euthanasia. From each cadaver, one segment was randomly assigned to control (C), hand-sewn enterotomy (HSE), and skin staple enterotomy (SSE) groups, and two segments were randomly assigned to hand-sewn anastomosis (HSA) and skin staple anastomosis (SSA) groups. Construct completion time, initial leak pressure (ILP), and maximum intraluminal pressure were compared. Leakage location was reported.
Mean time (s) ± SD was longer (p < .001) for HSA (317.0 ± 50.9) than SSA (160.8 ± 13.1) and for HSE (172.0 ± 36.5) than SSE (20.3 ± 5.0). ILP (mean ± SD) for C (600.0 mmHg ±0.0) was higher (p < .001) than all constructs. ILP (mean ± SD) for SSA (124.2 mmHg ±83.7) was not different (p = .49) than HSA (86.1 ± 51.9), but HSE (200.3 ± 114.7) was higher (p < .001) than SSE (32.2 ± 39.7). Immediate leakage from the center of enterotomy closure was observed in 7/20 SSE.
HSA construct completion took twice as long as SSA with no difference in intraluminal pressures. Although HSE construct completion took 8x as long as SSE, HSE had higher intraluminal pressures.
In cats, SSA may be an alternative to HSA for intestinal anastomosis, but SSE is not recommended as an alternative to HSE for intestinal enterotomy closure.
比较猫的手工缝合吻合术和皮肤钉合吻合术与肠切开术在完成时间和渗漏测试方面的差异。
离体、随机研究。
新鲜的猫尸体(n=20)。
从每个尸体上采集 8cm 的空肠段,在安乐死后的同一天进行测试。每个尸体的一段随机分配到对照组(C)、手工缝合肠切开术(HSE)和皮肤钉合肠切开术(SSE)组,两段随机分配到手工吻合术(HSA)和皮肤钉合吻合术(SSA)组。比较构建完成时间、初始泄漏压力(ILP)和最大腔内压力。报告泄漏位置。
HSA(317.0±50.9)的平均时间(s)±标准差明显长于 SSA(160.8±13.1)(p<.001),HSE(172.0±36.5)的平均时间(s)±标准差明显长于 SSE(20.3±5.0)(p<.001)。C 组的 ILP(平均值±标准差)(600.0mmHg±0.0)明显高于所有构建物(p<.001)。SSA 的 ILP(平均值±标准差)(124.2mmHg±83.7)与 HSA(86.1±51.9)没有差异(p=0.49),但 HSE(200.3±114.7)明显高于 SSE(32.2±39.7)(p<.001)。在 7/20 的 SSE 中观察到肠切开关闭中心处立即出现渗漏。
HSA 构建完成时间是 SSA 的两倍,但腔内压力没有差异。尽管 HSE 构建完成时间是 SSE 的 8 倍,但 HSE 的腔内压力更高。
在猫中,SSA 可能是肠吻合术的 HSA 替代方法,但不建议 SSE 替代 HSE 用于肠切开术闭合。