• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

嗅觉训练对 COVID-19 所致嗅觉丧失的影响。

The effect of smell training on COVID-19 induced smell loss.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Rhinology. 2024 Aug 1;62(4):386-393. doi: 10.4193/Rhin23.191.

DOI:10.4193/Rhin23.191
PMID:38446154
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

while smell training appears to be effective for post viral smell loss, its effectiveness in COVID-19 induced smell loss is currently not well known. Therefore, we aim to investigate the potential effect of smell training on patients with COVID-19 induced smell loss.

METHODS

we conducted a case-control study with two comparable cohorts. One of which (n=111) was instructed to perform smell training twice daily for 12 weeks, therapeutical adherence was monitored on a daily schedule, while the other cohort (n=50) did not perform smell training. The Sniffin' Sticks Test (SST) was used to objectify participants' sense of smell at baseline and after 12 weeks, reported as a Threshold, Discrimination, and Identification (TDI) score. We also determined the association between therapeutical adherence and the TDI scores.

RESULTS

we found a significant difference in psychophysical smell function between patients with COVID-19 induced smell disorders who performed 12 weeks of smell training and those who did not. Median TDI difference between groups was 2.00 However, there was no association between the therapeutical adherence and olfactory function.

CONCLUSION

we discovered a significant moderate difference in psychophysical smell function between patients with COVID-19-induced smell disorders who performed smell training and those who did not, implying a possible advantage of training. However, no relationship was found between therapeutical adherence of smell training and olfactory function.

摘要

目的

虽然嗅觉训练似乎对病毒性嗅觉丧失有效,但它在 COVID-19 引起的嗅觉丧失中的有效性目前还不清楚。因此,我们旨在研究嗅觉训练对 COVID-19 引起的嗅觉丧失患者的潜在效果。

方法

我们进行了一项病例对照研究,有两个可比的队列。其中一个(n=111)被指示每天进行两次嗅觉训练,为期 12 周,治疗依从性每天进行监测,而另一个队列(n=50)则不进行嗅觉训练。使用嗅觉测试(Sniffin' Sticks Test,SST)在基线和 12 周后客观评估参与者的嗅觉,结果表示为阈值、辨别和识别(TDI)分数。我们还确定了治疗依从性与 TDI 分数之间的关联。

结果

我们发现,接受 12 周嗅觉训练的 COVID-19 引起嗅觉障碍患者和未接受嗅觉训练的患者之间的心理物理嗅觉功能存在显著差异。组间 TDI 差异中位数为 2.00。然而,治疗依从性与嗅觉功能之间没有关联。

结论

我们发现,接受嗅觉训练的 COVID-19 引起嗅觉障碍患者和未接受嗅觉训练的患者之间的心理物理嗅觉功能存在显著的中等差异,这表明训练可能有优势。然而,嗅觉训练的治疗依从性与嗅觉功能之间没有关系。

相似文献

1
The effect of smell training on COVID-19 induced smell loss.嗅觉训练对 COVID-19 所致嗅觉丧失的影响。
Rhinology. 2024 Aug 1;62(4):386-393. doi: 10.4193/Rhin23.191.
2
Gaining Back What Is Lost: Recovering the Sense of Smell in Mild to Moderate Patients After COVID-19.重拾失去的嗅觉:新冠康复患者中轻度至中度嗅觉丧失的嗅觉恢复。
Chem Senses. 2020 Dec 5;45(9):875-881. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjaa066.
3
Persistent COVID-19 parosmia and olfactory loss post olfactory training: randomized clinical trial comparing central and peripheral-acting therapeutics.持续性 COVID-19 嗅觉异常和嗅觉训练后嗅觉丧失:比较中枢和外周作用治疗药物的随机临床试验。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jul;281(7):3671-3678. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08548-6. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
4
Treatment of Olfactory Disorders After SARS - CoViD 2 Virus Infection.SARS-CoV-2 病毒感染后嗅觉障碍的治疗。
Ear Nose Throat J. 2024 Jun;103(1_suppl):48S-53S. doi: 10.1177/01455613231168487. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
5
Effects of classical olfactory training in patients with COVID-19-related persistent loss of smell.COVID-19 相关持续性嗅觉丧失患者的经典嗅觉训练效果。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Feb;280(2):757-763. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07570-w. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
6
Psychophysical evaluation of chemosensory functions 5 weeks after olfactory loss due to COVID-19: a prospective cohort study on 72 patients.新冠病毒嗅觉丧失 5 周后的化学感觉功能的心理物理学评估:一项针对 72 例患者的前瞻性队列研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Jan;278(1):101-108. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06267-2. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
7
One-year psychophysical evaluation of COVID-19-induced olfactory disorders: a prospective cohort study.一项关于 COVID-19 引起的嗅觉障碍的为期一年的心理物理学评估:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Med. 2023 Dec 8;21(1):490. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03205-x.
8
Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction persistence after COVID-19: a prospective study.新冠病毒感染后嗅觉功能障碍持续时间的评估:一项前瞻性研究。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Feb;26(3):1042-1048. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202202_28014.
9
Olfactory function and viral recovery in COVID-19.新冠病毒感染患者的嗅觉功能和病毒恢复情况。
Brain Behav. 2021 Mar;11(3):e02006. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2006. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
10
Injection of Platelet Rich Plasma in the Olfactory Cleft for COVID-19 Patients With Persistent Olfactory Dysfunction: Description of the Technique.富血小板血浆注射治疗 COVID-19 嗅觉障碍患者嗅觉障碍:技术描述。
Ear Nose Throat J. 2024 Jun;103(1_suppl):115S-119S. doi: 10.1177/01455613221124773. Epub 2022 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Four odorants for olfactory training are enough: a pilot study.四种气味用于嗅觉训练已足够:一项初步研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Dec;281(12):6445-6458. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08930-4. Epub 2024 Sep 6.