Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e240728. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0728.
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a complication of diabetes that can lead to vision loss. Outcomes of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and insulin pump use in DR are not well understood.
To assess the use of CGM, insulin pump, or both, and DR and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective cohort study of adults with T1D in a tertiary diabetes center and ophthalmology center was conducted from 2013 to 2021, with data analysis performed from June 2022 to April 2023.
Use of diabetes technologies, including insulin pump, CGM, and both CGM and insulin pump.
The primary outcome was development of DR or PDR. A secondary outcome was the progression of DR for patients in the longitudinal cohort. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed for development of DR and PDR and association with CGM and insulin pump use.
A total of 550 adults with T1D were included (median age, 40 [IQR, 28-54] years; 54.4% female; 24.5% Black or African American; and 68.4% White), with a median duration of diabetes of 20 (IQR, 10-30) years, and median hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 7.8% (IQR, 7.0%-8.9%). Overall, 62.7% patients used CGM, 58.2% used an insulin pump, and 47.5% used both; 44% (244 of 550) of the participants had DR at any point during the study. On univariate analysis, CGM use was associated with lower odds of DR and PDR, and CGM with pump was associated with lower odds of PDR (all P < .05), compared with no CGM use. Multivariable logistic regression adjusting for age, sex, race and ethnicity, diabetes duration, microvascular and macrovascular complications, insurance type, and mean HbA1c, showed that CGM was associated with lower odds of DR (odds ratio [OR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.32-0.84; P = .008) and PDR (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.75; P = .004), compared with no CGM use. In the longitudinal analysis of participants without baseline PDR, 79 of 363 patients (21.8%) had progression of DR during the study.
In this cohort study of adults with T1D, CGM use was associated with lower odds of developing DR and PDR, even after adjusting for HbA1c. These findings suggest that CGM may be useful for diabetes management to mitigate risk for DR and PDR.
糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)是糖尿病的一种并发症,可导致视力丧失。连续血糖监测(CGM)和胰岛素泵使用在 DR 中的效果尚不清楚。
评估 CGM、胰岛素泵或两者在 1 型糖尿病(T1D)成人中的使用情况,以及在这些患者中 DR 和增生性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)的发生情况。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项对一家三级糖尿病中心和眼科中心的 T1D 成人进行的回顾性队列研究,于 2013 年至 2021 年进行,数据分析于 2023 年 6 月至 2023 年 4 月进行。
使用糖尿病技术,包括胰岛素泵、CGM 和 CGM 与胰岛素泵联合使用。
主要结局是 DR 或 PDR 的发生。次要结局是纵向队列中 DR 的进展。多变量逻辑回归模型评估了 DR 和 PDR 的发生情况,并评估了与 CGM 和胰岛素泵使用的关联。
共纳入 550 名 T1D 成人(中位年龄,40 [IQR,28-54] 岁;54.4%女性;24.5%黑种人或非裔美国人;68.4%白种人),中位糖尿病病程 20 年(IQR,10-30 年),中位糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)7.8%(IQR,7.0%-8.9%)。总体而言,62.7%的患者使用 CGM,58.2%使用胰岛素泵,47.5%同时使用两种方法;在研究期间,550 名参与者中有 44%(244 名)出现了任何类型的 DR。单变量分析显示,与不使用 CGM 相比,使用 CGM 与较低的 DR 和 PDR 发生几率相关,而 CGM 与泵联合使用与较低的 PDR 发生几率相关(均 P < .05)。多变量逻辑回归分析调整了年龄、性别、种族和民族、糖尿病病程、微血管和大血管并发症、保险类型和平均 HbA1c 后,结果显示与不使用 CGM 相比,CGM 与较低的 DR(比值比 [OR],0.52;95%CI,0.32-0.84;P = .008)和 PDR(OR,0.42;95%CI,0.23-0.75;P = .004)发生几率相关。在无基线 PDR 的参与者的纵向分析中,363 名患者中有 79 名(21.8%)在研究期间 DR 进展。
在这项针对 T1D 成人的队列研究中,与不使用 CGM 相比,使用 CGM 与较低的 DR 和 PDR 发生几率相关,即使在调整了 HbA1c 后也是如此。这些发现表明,CGM 可能对糖尿病管理有用,以降低 DR 和 PDR 的风险。