Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Siirt Education and Research Hospital, Siirt, Turkey.
Department of Neurology, Siirt Education and Research Hospital, Siirt, Turkey.
Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Aug;193(4):2001-2009. doi: 10.1007/s11845-024-03628-2. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
Peripheral myofascial mechanisms have been identified as contributors to migraine pathophysiology. The specific comorbid relationship between migraine and cervical trigger points may exacerbate the occurrence and severity of migraine attacks. Trigger point injections (TPIs) are frequently employed to address headaches and alleviate migraine symptoms. The current study explores the impact of concurrent myofascial trigger point injection (MTrPI) and occipital nerve block (greater occipital nerve block [GONB] + lesser occipital nerve block [LONB]) on the severity of headaches and the number of migraine attacks in individuals with chronic migraine (CM) and cervical myofascial trigger points (MTrPs), with a comparison of occipital nerve block alone (GONB + LONB). During trigger point examination and injection, trapezius, levator scapulae, splenius capitis, temporalis, and sternocleidomastoid muscles were targeted. We planned the treatment based on whether they were in the muscle groups we determined, rather than the number of trigger points.
This study enrolled 62 individuals experiencing CM with bilateral headache and cervical MTrP who sought care at the Algology Unit within the Departments of Neurology and Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation at Siirt Training and Research Hospital between 2020 and 2022. The CM cohort was stratified into two groups: group 1 received trigger point injections (TrPI), while group 2 underwent concurrent bilateral occipital nerve block (GONB + LONB) and TrPI. Both groups underwent three treatment sessions with bupivacaine 0.5% (1 ml = 5 mg) in weeks 1, 2, and 4. Visual analog scale (VAS) was used to measure the patients' pain intensity. The evaluation included the assessment of the monthly migraine frequency and visual analog scale (VAS) p score for pain before treatment (BT) and after treatment (AT), conducted at baseline and during follow-up visits. Analysis of the data was conducted utilizing IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows version 28.0 software.
Among patients diagnosed with CM and MTrPs, 32 individuals (51.6%) underwent GONB and LONB, while 30 patients (48.4%) received simultaneous GONB, LONB, and cervical MTrPI. Within the entire sample, 51 participants (82.3%) were female, and 11 (17.7%) were male, with a mean age of 32.81 ± 10.75 years. With an average age of 32.81 ± 10.75 years, there was no statistically significant variance between the two groups (p = 0.516). Of the total cohort, 45 individuals (72.6%) reported experiencing headaches persisting for 12 months or longer. Among CM patients, 80% had active trigger points, while 20% had latent trigger points. No statistically significant difference was observed between the groups concerning TrPs (p = 0.158), and the distribution of TrPs was homogenous across the two groups. In group 1, the median (min-max) monthly frequency of migraines reduced from 18.5 days (range: 15.0 to 25.0 days) before treatment to 12.0 days (range: 7.0 to 17.0 days) after treatment (p = 0.000). In group 2, the median monthly frequency of migraines reduced from 16.5 days (range: 15.0 to 22.0 days) before treatment to 4.0 days (range: 2.0 to 8.0 days) after treatment (p = 0.000). The median (min-max) VAS score in group 1 was 8.0 (range: 5.0 to 9.0) before treatment, 4.0 (range: 2.0 to 6.0) at week 1, and 5.0 (range: 4.0 to 8.0) at week 4 (p = 0.000). In group 2, the median VAS score was 7.0 (range: 5.0 to 9.0) before treatment, 0.0 (range: 0.0 to 0.3) at week 1, and 2.0 (range: 0.0 to 0.3) at week 4 (p = 0.000). There were significant distinctions between the groups in terms of both the monthly count of migraine days and the severity of headaches (p = 0.000).
The combination of repeated MTrPIs and ONB proves more effective than ONB alone in managing patients with CM and cervical MTrP. In patients with CM, performing TrPs examination and adding treatments for this may contribute to the treatment. In cases where patients endure prolonged episodes of headache associated with chronic migraine, the inclusion of trigger point injections alongside peripheral nerve blocks may offer enhanced therapeutic benefits.
周围性肌筋膜机制已被确定为偏头痛病理生理学的贡献者。偏头痛和颈椎触发点之间的特定共病关系可能会加剧偏头痛发作的发生和严重程度。触发点注射(TPIs)常用于治疗头痛和缓解偏头痛症状。本研究探讨了同时进行肌筋膜触发点注射(MTrPI)和枕神经阻滞(枕大神经阻滞[GONB]+枕小神经阻滞[LONB])对慢性偏头痛(CM)和颈椎肌筋膜触发点(MTrPs)患者头痛严重程度和偏头痛发作次数的影响,并比较了单独进行枕神经阻滞(GONB+LONB)的效果。在触发点检查和注射过程中,针对斜方肌、肩胛提肌、头夹肌、颞肌和胸锁乳突肌进行了治疗。我们根据是否在我们确定的肌肉群中进行治疗,而不是根据触发点的数量来计划治疗。
本研究纳入了 2020 年至 2022 年期间在锡尔特培训和研究医院神经科和物理治疗与康复科的疼痛科就诊的 62 名双侧头痛和颈椎 MTrP 的 CM 患者。CM 队列分为两组:组 1 接受触发点注射(TrPI),组 2 接受双侧枕神经阻滞(GONB+LONB)和 TrPI。两组均在第 1、2 和 4 周接受 0.5%布比卡因(1 ml=5 mg)治疗 3 次。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量患者的疼痛强度。评估包括每月偏头痛发作频率和治疗前后的视觉模拟量表(VAS)p 评分,在基线和随访时进行。数据分析采用 IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows 版本 28.0 软件进行。
在诊断为 CM 和 MTrPs 的患者中,32 名患者(51.6%)接受了 GONB 和 LONB,30 名患者(48.4%)同时接受了 GONB、LONB 和颈椎 MTrPI。在整个样本中,51 名参与者(82.3%)为女性,11 名(17.7%)为男性,平均年龄为 32.81±10.75 岁。两组之间的平均年龄无统计学差异(p=0.516)。在所有患者中,45 名患者(72.6%)报告头痛持续 12 个月或以上。在 CM 患者中,80%有活动触发点,20%有潜伏触发点。两组间触发点无统计学差异(p=0.158),且两组间触发点分布均匀。在组 1 中,偏头痛每月发作频率中位数(最小-最大范围)从治疗前的 18.5 天(范围:15.0-25.0 天)降至治疗后的 12.0 天(范围:7.0-17.0 天)(p=0.000)。在组 2 中,偏头痛每月发作频率中位数(最小-最大范围)从治疗前的 16.5 天(范围:15.0-22.0 天)降至治疗后的 4.0 天(范围:2.0-8.0 天)(p=0.000)。组 1 的中位数(最小-最大范围)VAS 评分为 8.0(范围:5.0-9.0),第 1 周为 4.0(范围:2.0-6.0),第 4 周为 5.0(范围:4.0-8.0)(p=0.000)。在组 2 中,VAS 评分中位数(最小-最大范围)为 7.0(范围:5.0-9.0),第 1 周为 0.0(范围:0.0-0.3),第 4 周为 2.0(范围:0.0-0.3)(p=0.000)。两组间每月偏头痛天数和头痛严重程度均有显著差异(p=0.000)。
重复 MTrPI 和 ONB 的联合治疗比单独进行 ONB 治疗更能有效管理 CM 和颈椎 MTrP 患者。对于患有慢性偏头痛的患者,进行触发点检查并增加对此的治疗可能有助于治疗。对于那些经历长时间慢性偏头痛相关头痛的患者,将触发点注射与周围神经阻滞结合使用可能会提供更好的治疗效果。