Laboratoire d'Étude des Mécanismes Cognitifs, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France.
Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive, Aix-Marseille University & CNRS, Marseille, France.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Apr;86(3):883-896. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02872-z. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
To probe the processing of gaze-dependent positional information and gaze-independent order information when matching strings of characters, we compared effects of visual similarity (hypothesized to affect gaze-centered position coding) with the effects of character transpositions (hypothesized to affect the processing of gaze-independent order information). In Experiment 1, we obtained empirical measures of visual similarity for pairs of characters, separately for uppercase consonants and keyboard symbols. These similarity values were then used in Experiment 2 to create pairs of four-character stimuli (four letters or four symbols) that could differ by substituting one character with a different character from the same category that was visually similar (e.g., FJDK-FJBK) or dissimilar (e.g., FJVK-FJBK). We also compared the effects of transposing two characters (e.g., FBJK-FJBK) with substituting two characters (e.g., FHSK-FJBK). "Different" responses were harder to make in the single substitution condition when the substituted character was visually similar, and this effect was not conditioned by character type. On the other hand, transposition costs (i.e., greater difficulty in detecting a difference with transpositions compared with double substitutions) were greater for letters compared with symbols. We conclude that visual similarity mainly affects the generic gaze-dependent processing of complex visual features, and that the encoding of letter order involves a mechanism that is specific to reading.
为了探究在匹配字符序列时,注视依赖位置信息和注视独立顺序信息的处理方式,我们比较了视觉相似性的影响(假设会影响以注视为中心的位置编码)与字符置换的影响(假设会影响注视独立顺序信息的处理)。在实验 1 中,我们分别针对大写字母和键盘符号,对字符对的视觉相似性进行了经验测量。然后,在实验 2 中,我们使用这些相似性值创建了由四个字符组成的刺激对(四个字母或四个符号),这些字符可以通过用来自同一类别、视觉上相似(例如,FJDK-FJBK)或不相似(例如,FJVK-FJBK)的字符替换一个字符来进行区分。我们还比较了置换两个字符(例如,FBJK-FJBK)与替换两个字符(例如,FHSK-FJBK)的效果。当替换字符在视觉上相似时,在单个替换条件下,做出“不同”反应更加困难,而这种效果不受字符类型的影响。另一方面,与双替换相比,置换的转换成本(即,与置换相比,检测差异的难度更大)对于字母来说更大,而对于符号来说则更小。我们的结论是,视觉相似性主要影响复杂视觉特征的通用注视依赖处理,而字母顺序的编码涉及到专门用于阅读的机制。