Department of Pathology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Department of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Cancer Med. 2024 Feb;13(4):e6995. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6995.
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (EBV-posDLBCL) is an aggressive B-cell lymphoma that often presents similar morphological and immune phenotype features to that of EBV-negative DLBCL (EBV-negDLBCL).
To better understand their difference in genomic landscape, we performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) of EBV-posDLBCL and EBV-negDLBCL.
This analysis revealed a new mutational signature 17 (unknown) and signature 29 (smoking) in EBV-posDLBCL as well as a specific mutational signature 24 (associated with aflatoxin) in EBV-negDLBCL. Compared with EBV-negDLBCL, more somatic copy number alterations (CNAs) and deletions were detected in EBV-posDLBCL (p = 0.01). The most frequent CNAs specifically detected in EBV-posDLBCL were gains at 9p24.1 (PDL1 and JAK2), 8q22.2-q24.23 (DEPTOR and MYC), and 7q31.31-q32.2 (MET), which were validated in additional EBV-posDLBCL cases. Overall, 53.7% (22/41) and 62.9% (22/35) of the cases expressed PD-L1 and c-MET, respectively, in neoplastic cells, whereas only 15.4% (4/26) expressed c-MYC. Neoplastic c-MET expression was positively correlated with PD-L1 (p < 0.001) and MYC expression (p = 0.016). However, EBV-posDLBCL cases did not show any differences in overall survival between PD-L1-, c-MET-, or c-MYC-positive and -negative cases or between age-related groups. Analysis of the association between somatic mutation load and EBV status showed no difference in the distribution of tumor mutant burden between the two lymphomas (p = 0.41). Recurrent mutations in EBV-posDLBCL implicated several genes, including DCAF8L1, KLF2, and NOL9, while in EBV-negDLBCL, ANK2, BPTF, and CNIH3 were more frequently mutated. Additionally, PIM1 is the most altered gene in all the WES-detected cases.
Our results confirm that genomic alteration differs significantly between EBV-posDLBCL and EBV-negDLBCL, and reveal new genetic alterations in EBV-posDLBCL. The positive correlation of c-MET and PD-L1/c-Myc expression may be involved in the pathogenesis of EBV-posDLBCL, which is should be explored prospectively in trials involving MET-directed therapies.
EB 病毒阳性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(EBV-posDLBCL)是一种侵袭性 B 细胞淋巴瘤,其形态学和免疫表型特征常与 EBV 阴性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(EBV-negDLBCL)相似。
为了更好地了解它们在基因组景观上的差异,我们对 EBV-posDLBCL 和 EBV-negDLBCL 进行了全外显子组测序(WES)。
这项分析揭示了 EBV-posDLBCL 中存在新的突变特征 17(未知)和特征 29(吸烟),以及 EBV-negDLBCL 中存在特定的突变特征 24(与黄曲霉毒素有关)。与 EBV-negDLBCL 相比,EBV-posDLBCL 中检测到更多的体细胞拷贝数改变(CNAs)和缺失(p=0.01)。在 EBV-posDLBCL 中特异性检测到的最常见的 CNAs 是 9p24.1(PDL1 和 JAK2)、8q22.2-q24.23(DEPTOR 和 MYC)和 7q31.31-q32.2(MET)的获得,这些在额外的 EBV-posDLBCL 病例中得到了验证。总体而言,53.7%(22/41)和 62.9%(22/35)的病例在肿瘤细胞中表达 PD-L1 和 c-MET,而仅 15.4%(4/26)表达 c-MYC。肿瘤 c-MET 表达与 PD-L1(p<0.001)和 MYC 表达呈正相关(p=0.016)。然而,在 EBV-posDLBCL 病例中,PD-L1、c-MET 或 c-MYC 阳性和阴性病例之间以及年龄相关组之间的总生存没有差异。对体细胞突变负荷与 EBV 状态之间的关联进行分析显示,两种淋巴瘤之间肿瘤突变负担的分布没有差异(p=0.41)。在 EBV-posDLBCL 中,复发性突变涉及几个基因,包括 DCAF8L1、KLF2 和 NOL9,而在 EBV-negDLBCL 中,ANK2、BPTF 和 CNIH3 更常发生突变。此外,PIM1 是所有 WES 检测到的病例中改变最明显的基因。
我们的结果证实,EBV-posDLBCL 和 EBV-negDLBCL 之间的基因组改变存在显著差异,并揭示了 EBV-posDLBCL 中的新遗传改变。c-MET 和 PD-L1/c-Myc 表达的正相关可能参与了 EBV-posDLBCL 的发病机制,这应在涉及 MET 定向治疗的试验中进行前瞻性探索。