Suppr超能文献

比较 EBV 阳性和 EBV 阴性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的基因组改变。

Comparison of genomic alterations in Epstein-Barr virus-positive and Epstein-Barr virus-negative diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, China.

Department of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2024 Feb;13(4):e6995. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6995.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (EBV-posDLBCL) is an aggressive B-cell lymphoma that often presents similar morphological and immune phenotype features to that of EBV-negative DLBCL (EBV-negDLBCL).

AIMS AND METHODS

To better understand their difference in genomic landscape, we performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) of EBV-posDLBCL and EBV-negDLBCL.

RESULTS

This analysis revealed a new mutational signature 17 (unknown) and signature 29 (smoking) in EBV-posDLBCL as well as a specific mutational signature 24 (associated with aflatoxin) in EBV-negDLBCL. Compared with EBV-negDLBCL, more somatic copy number alterations (CNAs) and deletions were detected in EBV-posDLBCL (p = 0.01). The most frequent CNAs specifically detected in EBV-posDLBCL were gains at 9p24.1 (PDL1 and JAK2), 8q22.2-q24.23 (DEPTOR and MYC), and 7q31.31-q32.2 (MET), which were validated in additional EBV-posDLBCL cases. Overall, 53.7% (22/41) and 62.9% (22/35) of the cases expressed PD-L1 and c-MET, respectively, in neoplastic cells, whereas only 15.4% (4/26) expressed c-MYC. Neoplastic c-MET expression was positively correlated with PD-L1 (p < 0.001) and MYC expression (p = 0.016). However, EBV-posDLBCL cases did not show any differences in overall survival between PD-L1-, c-MET-, or c-MYC-positive and -negative cases or between age-related groups. Analysis of the association between somatic mutation load and EBV status showed no difference in the distribution of tumor mutant burden between the two lymphomas (p = 0.41). Recurrent mutations in EBV-posDLBCL implicated several genes, including DCAF8L1, KLF2, and NOL9, while in EBV-negDLBCL, ANK2, BPTF, and CNIH3 were more frequently mutated. Additionally, PIM1 is the most altered gene in all the WES-detected cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm that genomic alteration differs significantly between EBV-posDLBCL and EBV-negDLBCL, and reveal new genetic alterations in EBV-posDLBCL. The positive correlation of c-MET and PD-L1/c-Myc expression may be involved in the pathogenesis of EBV-posDLBCL, which is should be explored prospectively in trials involving MET-directed therapies.

摘要

背景

EB 病毒阳性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(EBV-posDLBCL)是一种侵袭性 B 细胞淋巴瘤,其形态学和免疫表型特征常与 EBV 阴性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(EBV-negDLBCL)相似。

目的和方法

为了更好地了解它们在基因组景观上的差异,我们对 EBV-posDLBCL 和 EBV-negDLBCL 进行了全外显子组测序(WES)。

结果

这项分析揭示了 EBV-posDLBCL 中存在新的突变特征 17(未知)和特征 29(吸烟),以及 EBV-negDLBCL 中存在特定的突变特征 24(与黄曲霉毒素有关)。与 EBV-negDLBCL 相比,EBV-posDLBCL 中检测到更多的体细胞拷贝数改变(CNAs)和缺失(p=0.01)。在 EBV-posDLBCL 中特异性检测到的最常见的 CNAs 是 9p24.1(PDL1 和 JAK2)、8q22.2-q24.23(DEPTOR 和 MYC)和 7q31.31-q32.2(MET)的获得,这些在额外的 EBV-posDLBCL 病例中得到了验证。总体而言,53.7%(22/41)和 62.9%(22/35)的病例在肿瘤细胞中表达 PD-L1 和 c-MET,而仅 15.4%(4/26)表达 c-MYC。肿瘤 c-MET 表达与 PD-L1(p<0.001)和 MYC 表达呈正相关(p=0.016)。然而,在 EBV-posDLBCL 病例中,PD-L1、c-MET 或 c-MYC 阳性和阴性病例之间以及年龄相关组之间的总生存没有差异。对体细胞突变负荷与 EBV 状态之间的关联进行分析显示,两种淋巴瘤之间肿瘤突变负担的分布没有差异(p=0.41)。在 EBV-posDLBCL 中,复发性突变涉及几个基因,包括 DCAF8L1、KLF2 和 NOL9,而在 EBV-negDLBCL 中,ANK2、BPTF 和 CNIH3 更常发生突变。此外,PIM1 是所有 WES 检测到的病例中改变最明显的基因。

结论

我们的结果证实,EBV-posDLBCL 和 EBV-negDLBCL 之间的基因组改变存在显著差异,并揭示了 EBV-posDLBCL 中的新遗传改变。c-MET 和 PD-L1/c-Myc 表达的正相关可能参与了 EBV-posDLBCL 的发病机制,这应在涉及 MET 定向治疗的试验中进行前瞻性探索。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62fd/10922027/304d8bd06a85/CAM4-13-e6995-g005.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验