Li Xin, Cai Shizhong, Chen Yan, Tian Xiaoming, Wang Aijun
Department of Psychology, Research Center for Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China.
Department of Child and Adolescent Healthcare, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215025, China.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Jun;242:105897. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105897. Epub 2024 Mar 10.
Previous studies have widely demonstrated that individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) exhibit deficits in conflict control tasks. However, there is limited evidence regarding the performance of children with ADHD in cross-modal conflict processing tasks. The current study aimed to investigate whether children with ADHD have poor conflict control, which has an impact on sensory dominance effects at different levels of information processing under the influence of visual similarity. A total of 82 children aged 7 to 14 years, including 41 children with ADHD and 41 age- and sex-matched typically developing (TD) children, were recruited. We used the 2:1 mapping paradigm to separate levels of conflict, and the congruency of the audiovisual stimuli was divided into three conditions. In C trials, the target stimulus and the distractor stimulus were identical, and the bimodal stimuli corresponded to the same response keys. In PRIC trials, the distractor stimulus differed from the target stimulus and did not correspond to any response keys. In RIC trials, the distractor stimulus differed from the target stimulus, and the bimodal stimuli corresponded to different response keys. Therefore, we explicitly differentiated cross-modal conflict into a preresponse level (PRIC > C), corresponding to the encoding process, and a response level (RIC > PRIC), corresponding to the response selection process. Our results suggested that auditory distractors caused more interference during visual processing than visual distractors caused during auditory processing (i.e., typical auditory dominance) at the preresponse level regardless of group. However, visual dominance effects were observed in the ADHD group, whereas no visual dominance effects were observed in the TD group at the response level. A possible explanation is that the increased interference effects due to visual similarity and children with ADHD made it more difficult to control conflict when simultaneously confronted with incongruent visual and auditory inputs. The current study highlights how children with ADHD process cross-modal conflicts at multiple levels of information processing, thereby shedding light on the mechanisms underlying ADHD.
以往研究广泛表明,患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的个体在冲突控制任务中表现出缺陷。然而,关于ADHD儿童在跨模态冲突处理任务中的表现,证据有限。当前研究旨在调查ADHD儿童是否存在冲突控制不佳的情况,这在视觉相似性影响下的不同信息处理水平上对感觉优势效应产生影响。共招募了82名7至14岁的儿童,其中包括41名ADHD儿童和41名年龄及性别匹配的发育正常(TD)儿童。我们使用2:1映射范式来区分冲突水平,视听刺激的一致性分为三种条件。在C试验中,目标刺激和干扰刺激相同,双峰刺激对应相同的反应键。在PRIC试验中,干扰刺激与目标刺激不同,且不对应任何反应键。在RIC试验中,干扰刺激与目标刺激不同,双峰刺激对应不同的反应键。因此,我们明确将跨模态冲突区分为对应编码过程的反应前水平(PRIC > C)和对应反应选择过程的反应水平(RIC > PRIC)。我们的结果表明,在反应前水平,无论组别如何,听觉干扰物在视觉处理过程中比视觉干扰物在听觉处理过程中造成的干扰更大(即典型的听觉优势)。然而,在反应水平上,ADHD组观察到视觉优势效应,而TD组未观察到视觉优势效应。一种可能的解释是,视觉相似性导致的干扰效应增加以及ADHD儿童在同时面对不一致的视觉和听觉输入时更难控制冲突。当前研究突出了ADHD儿童在多个信息处理水平上如何处理跨模态冲突,从而揭示了ADHD潜在的机制。