Suppr超能文献

了解欧洲公众对职场多元化和反歧视政策的支持情况。

Understanding public support for workplace diversity and antidiscrimination policies in Europe.

作者信息

Blommaert Lieselotte, Coenders Marcel

机构信息

Department of Sociology, Radboud Social Cultural Research, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Netherlands Institute for Social Research, The Hague, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Sociol. 2024 Feb 23;9:1256751. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1256751. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Societal processes and public opinion can affect whether employers take action and which policy measures they choose to boost diversity, equal opportunities and inclusion, and to reduce discrimination in the workplace. Yet, public opinion regarding workplace diversity initiatives (other than affirmative action) has so far received little scholarly attention, especially in Europe. Consequently, we have very little evidence about how the general public feels about workplace diversity policies - particularly those that are more common or more often discussed in Europe - and about which factors shape public support for these workplace diversity initiatives. Yet, a better understanding of the patterns and antecedents of citizens' attitudes toward workplace diversity policies is of clear scientific and practical importance. Against this background, this study sheds light on public attitudes toward three different, commonly applied types of workplace diversity policies, and examines which individual-level and - innovatively - national-level conditions shape public support. To do so, we bring together insights from various different and so far largely disconnected strands of research and a range of theoretical perspectives. We use large-scale, representative survey data from two pooled waves of the Eurobarometer, covering 38,009 citizens across 26 European countries. We enrich these data with information on national-level income inequality as well as countries' labor market and antidiscrimination legislation and policies, obtained from Eurostat and the Migrant Integration Policy Index (MIPEX). Results show significant differences in public support across the three types of policies, with the strongest support for diversity training, followed closely by monitoring recruitment procedures, whereas support for monitoring workforce composition is clearly lower. This is in line with the idea that support tends to be lower for more preferential and prescriptive workplace policies. Furthermore, we find that, in addition to individual-level factors - particularly gender, ethnic minority group membership, personal experiences with discrimination, prejudice, intergroup contact and political orientation - national-level conditions are important antecedents of public support for workplace diversity policies. That is, differences in public attitudes regarding such policies are also shaped by country-level income inequalities, people's perceptions of how widespread discrimination and unequal opportunities are in society, and national-level laws and policies to fight unequal opportunities.

摘要

社会进程和公众舆论会影响雇主是否采取行动,以及他们选择哪些政策措施来促进多元化、平等机会和包容性,并减少职场歧视。然而,到目前为止,关于职场多元化倡议(平权行动除外)的公众舆论很少受到学术关注,尤其是在欧洲。因此,我们几乎没有证据表明公众对职场多元化政策的看法——特别是那些在欧洲更常见或更常被讨论的政策——以及哪些因素塑造了公众对这些职场多元化倡议的支持。然而,更好地理解公民对职场多元化政策态度的模式和成因具有明确的科学和实践重要性。在此背景下,本研究揭示了公众对三种不同的、常用的职场多元化政策类型的态度,并考察了哪些个人层面以及——创新性地——国家层面的条件塑造了公众支持。为此,我们整合了来自各种不同且迄今为止基本脱节的研究线索的见解以及一系列理论观点。我们使用了欧洲晴雨表两轮合并调查的大规模代表性数据,涵盖26个欧洲国家的38009名公民。我们用从欧盟统计局和移民融合政策指数(MIPEX)获得的关于国家层面收入不平等以及各国劳动力市场和反歧视立法与政策的信息丰富了这些数据。结果显示,公众对这三种政策类型的支持存在显著差异,对多元化培训的支持最强,其次是对招聘程序监测的支持,而对劳动力构成监测的支持明显较低。这与以下观点一致,即对于更具优惠性和规定性的职场政策,支持往往较低。此外,我们发现,除了个人层面的因素——特别是性别、少数族裔群体成员身份、个人遭受歧视的经历、偏见、群体间接触和政治倾向——国家层面的条件也是公众支持职场多元化政策的重要成因。也就是说,公众对这类政策态度的差异也受到国家层面收入不平等、人们对社会中歧视和不平等机会普遍程度的认知以及国家层面打击不平等机会的法律和政策的影响。

相似文献

3
6
[Psychological barriers to professional inclusion of people with mental disabilities].[精神残疾者职业融入的心理障碍]
Encephale. 2014 Jun;40 Suppl 2:S103-14. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 Jun 16.

本文引用的文献

3
Which racial groups are associated with diversity?哪些种族群体与多样性有关?
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2010 Jul;16(3):443-6. doi: 10.1037/a0019723.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验