Nagaja Sharanika A, John Rubin S, Kumar Santhosh P, Krishnan Murugesan
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Feb 9;16(2):e53901. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53901. eCollection 2024 Feb.
Introduction Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), a solution of concentrated platelets, has been widely used to promote wound repair and tissue regeneration. In the treatment of pattern hair loss, platelets in PRP secrete an abundance of growth factors, including platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), fibroblast growth factor(FGF), and many more, which stimulate and increase signaling molecules and accelerate cell proliferation. In the PRP treatment for hair regrowth, the supratrochlear nerve (STN) block and supraorbital nerve (SON) block are given to anesthetize the scalp up to the vertex except for the temporal region. The ring block is the common local anesthetic technique used by infiltrating local anesthetic agents around the target area. The primary objectives were to compare the pain and anesthetic success rates produced by regional nerve blocks and ring blocks. Materials and methods A sample size of 100 patients undergoing PRP treatment for hair regrowth were taken as the subjects for the study. Patients were allotted into two groups by randomization. Group 1 was given regional nerve blocks as the anesthetic technique used for local anesthesia, and group 2 was given ring blocks. In the study group, STN and SON blocks as the regional nerve blocks were given 2% lignocaine with 1:80000 adrenaline to anesthetize the area, and the PRP was injected from the anterior hairline up to the vertex of the scalp, not involving the occipital and temporal regions. In the control group, a ring block was given for the same procedure. Participants from both groups were assessed for the pain and analgesia caused by ring block and regional nerve blocks using the visual analog scale (VAS). Results A mean rank of 30.28 was observed for the regional nerve block technique, and a mean rank of 70.72 was observed for the ring block technique. A p-value of 0.00 that is <0.05 was observed, which shows there is a significant difference in the pain and the analgesia experienced by the subjects between the two groups, during and three hours after the procedure. Conclusion PRP is one of the most commonly used treatments for hair regrowth. The ring block is the common local anesthetic technique used for producing anesthesia, while regional nerve blocks are more effective in producing local anesthesia. This study proves that STN and SON blocks are better anesthetic techniques than the ring block technique for PRP treatment in hair growth.
引言 富血小板血浆(PRP)是一种浓缩血小板溶液,已被广泛用于促进伤口修复和组织再生。在治疗斑秃时,PRP中的血小板会分泌大量生长因子,包括血小板衍生生长因子(PDGF)、成纤维细胞生长因子(FGF)等等,这些因子会刺激并增加信号分子,加速细胞增殖。在PRP治疗促进头发生长的过程中,会进行滑车上神经(STN)阻滞和眶上神经(SON)阻滞,以麻醉除颞部区域外直至头顶的头皮。环形阻滞是通过在目标区域周围浸润局部麻醉剂来使用的常见局部麻醉技术。主要目的是比较区域神经阻滞和环形阻滞产生的疼痛和麻醉成功率。
材料与方法 选取100例接受PRP治疗促进头发生长的患者作为研究对象。通过随机化将患者分为两组。第1组采用区域神经阻滞作为局部麻醉的麻醉技术,第2组采用环形阻滞。在研究组中,采用2%利多卡因加1:80000肾上腺素进行STN和SON阻滞作为区域神经阻滞来麻醉该区域,然后从发际线前部直至头皮顶部注射PRP,不涉及枕部和颞部区域。在对照组中,对相同操作采用环形阻滞。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对两组参与者进行环形阻滞和区域神经阻滞引起的疼痛和镇痛情况评估。
结果 区域神经阻滞技术的平均秩次为30.28,环形阻滞技术的平均秩次为70.72。观察到p值为0.00,即<0.05,这表明在操作期间及操作后三小时,两组受试者所经历的疼痛和镇痛存在显著差异。
结论 PRP是促进头发生长最常用的治疗方法之一。环形阻滞是用于产生麻醉的常见局部麻醉技术,而区域神经阻滞在产生局部麻醉方面更有效。本研究证明,在PRP治疗促进头发生长方面,STN和SON阻滞是比环形阻滞技术更好的麻醉技术。