Suppr超能文献

理解中国公众对农场动物福利态度中消费者-公民差距。

Understanding the consumer-citizen gap in Chinese public attitudes toward farm animal welfare.

机构信息

College of Economics and Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Changjiang Street 600#, Xiangfang District, Harbin, 150030, Heilongjiang, China.

Development Research Center of Modern Agriculture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 18;14(1):6426. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57280-y.

Abstract

Individuals of the general public can perform both consumer and citizen roles in farm animal welfare, and attitudes toward farm animal welfare may differ between these roles. However, scant research is available regarding this distinction, especially in developing countries such as China. The present study aimed to explore consumer-citizen gaps in Chinese public attitudes toward farm animal welfare across three dimensions and across demographic characteristics. A 36-item scale was designed, and completed by 5284 Chinese participants in a large-scale cross-sectional survey. Consumer-citizen gaps in attitudes toward farm animal welfare across three dimensions and demographic characteristics were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and effects of demographic characteristics on attitudes were further explored by linear regression analysis. A significant consumer-citizen gap was found in overall attitudes, although the consumer role was only slightly more positive than the citizen role. The consumer-citizen gap is driven by differences in both cognitive attitudes and behavioral attitudes. The gap is most pronounced in cognitive attitudes, where the consumer role is significantly more positive, and smaller in behavioral attitudes, where the citizen role is significantly more positive. The consumer-citizen gap varies significantly among different demographic groups, including gender, age, education, monthly household income, area of residence, and occupation. Additionally, education, monthly household income, and area of residence have significant effects on attitudes in the dual role, whereas gender only affect consumer-role attitudes significantly. The findings provide evidence that consumer-citizen gaps in Chinese public attitudes toward farm animal welfare exist, and this distinction is mainly determined by demographic characteristics.

摘要

公众个体在农场动物福利方面可以同时扮演消费者和公民这两个角色,而他们对农场动物福利的态度可能在这两个角色之间存在差异。然而,针对这种区别,相关研究相对较少,尤其是在中国这样的发展中国家。本研究旨在探索中国公众对农场动物福利的态度在三个维度上以及在人口统计学特征上的消费者-公民差异。本研究设计了一个包含 36 个项目的量表,并通过一项大规模的横断面调查,对 5284 名中国参与者进行了调查。采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验分析了态度在三个维度和人口统计学特征上的消费者-公民差异,进一步通过线性回归分析探讨了人口统计学特征对态度的影响。研究发现,尽管消费者角色仅略高于公民角色,但在总体态度上存在显著的消费者-公民差异。这种差异主要归因于认知态度和行为态度的差异。在认知态度方面,差异最为明显,消费者角色的态度更为积极,而在行为态度方面,差异较小,公民角色的态度更为积极。这种差异在不同的人口统计学群体中存在显著差异,包括性别、年龄、教育程度、月家庭收入、居住地和职业。此外,教育程度、月家庭收入和居住地对双重角色的态度有显著影响,而性别仅对消费者角色的态度有显著影响。本研究结果提供了证据表明,中国公众对农场动物福利的态度存在消费者-公民差异,这种差异主要由人口统计学特征决定。

相似文献

1
Understanding the consumer-citizen gap in Chinese public attitudes toward farm animal welfare.
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 18;14(1):6426. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57280-y.
2
Factors influencing Chinese public attitudes toward farm animal welfare.
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 9;14:1049530. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1049530. eCollection 2023.
4
Applying the Behavioural Change Wheel to Encourage Higher Welfare Food Choices.
Animals (Basel). 2019 Aug 2;9(8):524. doi: 10.3390/ani9080524.
5
Public attitudes toward genetic modification in dairy cattle.
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 2;14(12):e0225372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225372. eCollection 2019.
6
Results of a national survey of US veterinary college faculty regarding attitudes toward farm animal welfare.
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2005 May 1;226(9):1538-46. doi: 10.2460/javma.2005.226.1538.
8
A survey to determine public opinion about the ethics and governance of farm animal welfare.
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2008 Oct 1;233(7):1121-6. doi: 10.2460/javma.233.7.1121.
9
Public attitudes toward dairy farm practices and technology related to milk production.
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 30;16(4):e0250850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250850. eCollection 2021.
10
Buying higher welfare poultry products? Profiling Flemish consumers who do and do not.
Poult Sci. 2009 Dec;88(12):2702-11. doi: 10.3382/ps.2009-00259.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors influencing Chinese public attitudes toward farm animal welfare.
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 9;14:1049530. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1049530. eCollection 2023.
4
Emerging market for pork with animal welfare attribute in China: An ethical perspective.
Meat Sci. 2023 Jan;195:108994. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.108994. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
6
Gender and Age Effects on Public Attitudes to, and Knowledge of, Animal Welfare in China.
Animals (Basel). 2022 May 26;12(11):1367. doi: 10.3390/ani12111367.
9
Attitudes towards refugees: Introducing a short three-dimensional scale.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2022 Oct;61(4):1305-1331. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12538. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
10
Chinese College Students' Attitudes towards Animal Welfare.
Animals (Basel). 2022 Jan 10;12(2):156. doi: 10.3390/ani12020156.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验