Luo Yun, Liu Chunxia, Li Yuechen, Jin Xianfeng, He Zhiming, Chen Qi
Chongqing Key Laboratory of GIS Application Research, School of Geography and Tourism, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing, 401331, China.
Chongqing Engineering Research Center for Remote Sensing Big Data Application, Chongqing Jinfo Mountain National Field Scientific Observation and Research Station for Karst Ecosystem, School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 6;10(5):e27660. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27660. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.
Protecting and stimulating rural vitality is a critical step towards driving rural revitalization and development; This study outlined the application of a measurement system that indexes rural vitality levels at the township scale and evaluates rural vitality in terms of potential regeneration, survivability, and development. This study combined the CRITIC weighting method, the TOPSIS pros and cons solution-distance method, and a vertical-horizontal comparison method to evaluate the rural vitality of 30 townships in Wuxi County, Chongqing. Using these results, this study divided the townships according to their type of rural development. A natural breakpoint method was used to visualize the spatial pattern of rural development levels.The research showed that: (1) The average value of the composite score of rural vitality in Wuxi County is 0.342, and more than half of the townships' composite vitality values are lower than the average value of the overall vitality, which leads to the conclusion that the overall level of rural vitality is low; (2) the comprehensive level of rural vitality in Wuxi County decreased from southwest to northeast, and showed local variations; (3) the degree of development within the study area was categorized as either dominant, comprehensive, or polarized, developmental deficiency type. This research argued that promoting the development of rural vitality in different villages requires careful scientific planning, detailed knowledge of individual geographic characteristics, and a clear rural development path that spans a range of spatial scales. Specific and specialized rural development strategies are thus required for each type of development.
保护和激发乡村活力是推动乡村振兴和发展的关键一步;本研究概述了一种测量系统的应用,该系统在乡镇尺度上对乡村活力水平进行指标化,并从潜在再生能力、生存能力和发展能力方面评估乡村活力。本研究结合CRITIC赋权法、TOPSIS优劣解距离法和纵横比较法,对重庆市巫溪县30个乡镇的乡村活力进行评估。利用这些结果,本研究根据乡村发展类型对乡镇进行划分。采用自然断点法对乡村发展水平的空间格局进行可视化。研究表明:(1)巫溪县乡村活力综合得分平均值为0.342,超过半数乡镇的综合活力值低于总体活力平均值,由此得出乡村活力总体水平较低的结论;(2)巫溪县乡村活力综合水平由西南向东北递减,并呈现局部差异;(3)研究区内的发展程度分为主导型、综合型或极化发展不足型。本研究认为,促进不同村庄的乡村活力发展需要精心的科学规划、对个体地理特征的详细了解以及跨越一系列空间尺度的清晰乡村发展路径。因此,每种发展类型都需要具体且专门的乡村发展战略。