Ahmad Syed Zain, Ivers Noah, Zenlea Ian, Parsons Janet A, Shah Baiju R, Mukerji Geetha, Punthakee Zubin, Shulman Rayzel
Institute of Medical Science, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Mar 18;5(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00563-2.
The fit between an intervention and its local context may affect its implementation and effectiveness. Researchers have stated that both fidelity (the degree to which an intervention is delivered, enacted, and received as intended) and adaptation to the local context are necessary for high-quality implementation. This study describes the implementation of an audit and feedback (AF)-based intervention to improve transition to type 1 diabetes adult care, at five sites, in terms of adaptation and fidelity.
An audit and feedback (AF)-based intervention for healthcare teams to improve transition to adult care for patients with type 1 diabetes was studied at five pediatric sites. The Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Implementation Strategies (FRAME-IS) was used to document the adaptations made during the study. Fidelity was determined on three different levels: delivery, enactment, and receipt.
Fidelity of delivery, receipt, and enactment were preserved during the implementation of the intervention. Of the five sites, three changed their chosen quality improvement initiative, however, within the parameters of the study protocol; therefore, fidelity was preserved while still enabling participants to adapt accordingly.
We describe implementing a multi-center AF-based intervention across five sites in Ontario to improve the transition from pediatric to adult diabetes care for youth with type 1 diabetes. This intervention adopted a balanced approach considering both adaptation and fidelity to foster a community of practice to facilitate implementing quality improvement initiatives for improving transition to adult diabetes care. This approach may be adapted for improving transition care for youth with other chronic conditions and to other complex AF-based interventions.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03781973. Registered 13 December 2018. Date of enrolment of the first participant to the trial: June 1, 2019.
一项干预措施与其当地环境的适配度可能会影响其实施情况和效果。研究人员指出,对于高质量的实施而言,保真度(即干预措施按照预期进行交付、执行和接受的程度)以及对当地环境的适应性都是必要的。本研究从适应性和保真度方面描述了一项基于审核与反馈(AF)的干预措施在五个地点实施,以改善向1型糖尿病成人护理过渡的情况。
在五个儿科地点研究了一项基于审核与反馈(AF)的干预措施,该措施旨在帮助医疗团队改善1型糖尿病患者向成人护理的过渡。采用《基于证据的实施策略的适应与修改报告框架》(FRAME-IS)来记录研究过程中所做的调整。从三个不同层面确定保真度:交付、执行和接受。
在干预措施的实施过程中,交付、接受和执行的保真度得以保持。在五个地点中,有三个改变了他们所选择的质量改进举措,不过是在研究方案的参数范围内;因此,在保持保真度的同时,仍使参与者能够做出相应调整。
我们描述了在安大略省的五个地点实施一项基于AF的多中心干预措施,以改善1型糖尿病青少年从儿科向成人糖尿病护理的过渡。该干预措施采用了一种兼顾适应性和保真度的平衡方法,以促进实践社区的形成,从而便于实施质量改进举措,以改善向成人糖尿病护理的过渡。这种方法可能适用于改善患有其他慢性病的青少年的过渡护理,以及其他基于AF的复杂干预措施。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03781973。于2018年12月13日注册。试验第一名参与者的入组日期:2019年6月1日。