Yildirim Dilek, Kavala Arzu, Değirmenci Öz Seda, Sezer Esra, Kuğu Emre, Coşkun Zeynep
Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, Istanbul Aydın University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing Administration, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 Jul;30(4):e13065. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13065. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is one of the methods that has validity for evaluating the consciousness levels of patients in the literature and is accepted by health authorities.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the inter-rater reliability of GCS in intensive care patients receiving palliative care.
A prospective cross sectional observational study. The study was conducted in a general intensive care unit with 20 beds with patients receiving palliative care. In the unit, 18 nurses worked in two shifts, day and night. Each patient's primary palliative care nurse and two additional researchers were given one minute to independently record the patient's GCS total and subscale scores. All observations were completed within 5 min as there could be significant changes in the patient's GCS score during observations.
A total of 258 assessments were completed. For the GCS total scoring, a moderate agreement was found between palliative care nurses and the first researcher-observer (49.0%) and also between palliative care nurses and the second researcher-observer (47.7%). In addition, there was a substantial agreement between the first and second researchers (78.9%) and also between all observers (61.5%) (all p = .001).
Although there was a near-perfect agreement between the two researcher-observers, we found only moderate agreement among all observers (palliative care nurses and two researcher-observers) in the evaluation of GCS total and subscale scores.
We found that lack of knowledge and training on the standardized use of GCS is still a problem for palliative and intensive care units. Because of the diversity of patients requiring GCS assessment in palliative care units, refresher training programs and hands-on workshops on consciousness assessment should be organized regularly for more experienced nurses.
格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)是文献中用于评估患者意识水平且被卫生当局认可的有效方法之一。
本研究旨在评估格拉斯哥昏迷量表在接受姑息治疗的重症监护患者中的评分者间信度。
一项前瞻性横断面观察性研究。该研究在一个设有20张床位的普通重症监护病房进行,研究对象为接受姑息治疗的患者。在该病房,18名护士分昼夜两班工作。每位患者的主要姑息治疗护士和另外两名研究人员有一分钟时间独立记录患者的GCS总分及各子量表得分。由于观察期间患者的GCS评分可能会有显著变化,所有观察均在5分钟内完成。
共完成了258次评估。对于GCS总分评分,姑息治疗护士与第一位研究观察者之间达成了中度一致性(49.0%),姑息治疗护士与第二位研究观察者之间也达成了中度一致性(47.7%)。此外,第一位和第二位研究人员之间达成了高度一致性(78.9%),所有观察者之间也达成了高度一致性(61.5%)(所有p = 0.001)。
尽管两位研究观察者之间达成了近乎完美的一致性,但我们发现所有观察者(姑息治疗护士和两位研究观察者)在评估GCS总分及子量表得分时仅达成了中度一致性。
我们发现,在姑息治疗和重症监护病房,对GCS标准化使用缺乏知识和培训仍是一个问题。由于姑息治疗病房中需要进行GCS评估的患者情况多样,应为经验更丰富的护士定期组织意识评估的复习培训项目和实践工作坊。