Surber Chiara, Hoepfel Dennis, Günther Vivien, Kersting Anette, Rufer Michael, Suslow Thomas, Bodenschatz Charlott Maria
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich (PUK), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 6;15:1338194. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1338194. eCollection 2024.
Alexithymia is a risk factor for emotional disorders and is characterized by differences in automatic and controlled emotion processing. The multi-stimulus free-viewing task has been used to detect increased negative and reduced positive attentional biases in depression and anxiety. In the present eye-tracking study, we examined whether lexical emotional priming directs attention toward emotion-congruent facial expressions and whether alexithymia is related to impairments in lexical priming and spontaneous attention deployment during multiple face perception.
A free-viewing task with happy, fearful, angry, and neutral faces shown simultaneously was administered to 32 alexithymic and 46 non-alexithymic individuals along with measures of negative affect and intelligence. Face presentation was preceded by masked emotion words. Indices of initial orienting and maintenance of attention were analyzed as a function of prime or target category and study group.
Time to first fixation was not affected by prime category or study group. Analysis of fixation duration yielded a three-way interaction. Alexithymic individuals exhibited no prime or target category effect, whereas non-alexithymic individuals showed a main effect of target condition, fixating happy faces longer than neutral and angry faces and fearful faces longer than angry faces.
Our results show evidence of attentional biases for positive and fearful social information in non-alexithymic individuals, but not in alexithymic individuals. The lack of spontaneous attentional preference for these social stimuli in alexithymia might contribute to a vulnerability for developing emotional disorders. Our data also suggest that briefly presented emotion words may not facilitate gaze orientation toward emotion-congruent stimuli.
述情障碍是情绪障碍的一个风险因素,其特征在于自动和受控情绪加工方面的差异。多刺激自由观看任务已被用于检测抑郁症和焦虑症中增加的负面和减少的正面注意偏向。在本眼动追踪研究中,我们考察了词汇情绪启动是否会将注意力引向情绪一致的面部表情,以及述情障碍是否与多面孔感知过程中词汇启动和自发注意分配的损伤有关。
对32名述情障碍者和46名非述情障碍者进行了一项自由观看任务,任务中同时呈现快乐、恐惧、愤怒和中性面孔,并测量了负面情绪和智力。在面孔呈现之前先呈现掩蔽的情绪词。将初始定向和注意力维持指标作为启动或目标类别以及研究组的函数进行分析。
首次注视时间不受启动类别或研究组的影响。注视持续时间分析产生了一个三因素交互作用。述情障碍个体未表现出启动或目标类别效应,而非述情障碍个体表现出目标条件的主效应,注视快乐面孔的时间长于中性和愤怒面孔,注视恐惧面孔的时间长于愤怒面孔。
我们的结果表明,非述情障碍个体对积极和恐惧的社会信息存在注意偏向的证据,但述情障碍个体不存在。述情障碍中对这些社会刺激缺乏自发的注意偏好可能导致易患情绪障碍。我们的数据还表明,短暂呈现的情绪词可能不会促进对情绪一致刺激的注视定向。