Kawashima Masahiro, Matsumoto Takeshi, Nishimura Takao, Mashima Susumu, Kobayashi Atsushi, Kanemitsu Eisho, Nagata Hiromitsu, Tanaka Toshihiro, Shimahara Yasuyuki
Department of Surgery, JCHO Yamatokoriyama Hospital, 1-62 Asahi-cho, Yamatokoriyama, Nara 6391013 Japan.
Department of Breast Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 6068507 Japan.
Int Cancer Conf J. 2024 Feb 12;13(2):153-157. doi: 10.1007/s13691-024-00656-8. eCollection 2024 Apr.
Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for liver metastases (LMs) from breast cancer is not a standard of care, but its effectiveness in patients with extensive LMs who cannot tolerate systemic therapy has been reported. Herein, we report a case of breast cancer LMs that were controlled by anthracycline-based HAIC. A 46-year-old woman with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer who had multiple LMs and bone metastases underwent seven lines of systemic therapy (paclitaxel/bevacizumab for 38 months; letrozole, nivolumab/fulvestrant, eribulin, gemcitabine/vinorelbine, high-dose toremifene/abemaciclib, and capecitabine for 21 months in total). However, owing to its adverse effects and the continued progression of the LMs, systemic therapy was switched to HAIC (40 mg/body epirubicin on day 1, 4 mg/body mitomycin C on days 1 and 15, and 500 mg/body 5-fluorouracil on days 1, 8, and 15; 28-day courses). In response to HAIC, the LMs remarkably regressed and were controlled for 17 months without severe adverse effects. HAIC was stopped when multiple brain metastases arose, and the patient died 2 months later. This case suggests that HAIC is a reasonable option for patients with extensive LMs, even in the late stage of treatment. HAIC recipients should be carefully selected through multidisciplinary discussions as the survival benefits of HAIC over systemic treatment remain unclear. Our findings identify a potential window for the use of traditional chemotherapeutic agents such as anthracyclines. Novel strategies to improve drug delivery are warranted in the future.
肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)用于治疗乳腺癌肝转移(LMs)并非标准治疗方法,但已有报道称其对无法耐受全身治疗的广泛LMs患者有效。在此,我们报告一例基于蒽环类药物的HAIC控制乳腺癌LMs的病例。一名46岁雌激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体2阴性的转移性乳腺癌女性患者,有多处LMs和骨转移,接受了七线全身治疗(紫杉醇/贝伐单抗治疗38个月;来曲唑、纳武单抗/氟维司群、艾瑞布林、吉西他滨/长春瑞滨、高剂量托瑞米芬/阿贝西利,以及卡培他滨,总共治疗21个月)。然而,由于其不良反应以及LMs持续进展,全身治疗改为HAIC(第1天给予表柔比星40mg/体,第1天和第15天给予丝裂霉素C 4mg/体,第1天、第8天和第15天给予5-氟尿嘧啶500mg/体;28天疗程)。对HAIC治疗有反应,LMs明显消退并得到控制达17个月,且无严重不良反应。当出现多发脑转移时停止HAIC治疗,患者2个月后死亡。该病例表明,即使在治疗晚期,HAIC对于广泛LMs患者也是一个合理的选择。由于HAIC相对于全身治疗的生存获益尚不清楚,应通过多学科讨论仔细选择接受HAIC治疗的患者。我们的研究结果确定了使用蒽环类等传统化疗药物的潜在时机。未来有必要采取新的策略来改善药物递送。