Scripps Center for Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, United States.
Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, Department of Chemistry, The Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, United States.
Anal Chem. 2024 Apr 9;96(14):5478-5488. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c05576. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
PubChem serves as a comprehensive repository, housing over 100 million unique chemical structures representing the breadth of our chemical knowledge across numerous fields including metabolism, pharmaceuticals, toxicology, cosmetics, agriculture, and many more. Rapid identification of these small molecules increasingly relies on electrospray ionization (ESI) paired with tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), particularly by comparison to genuine standard MS/MS data sets. Despite its widespread application, achieving consistency in MS/MS data across various analytical platforms remains an unaddressed concern. This study evaluated MS/MS data derived from one hundred molecular standards utilizing instruments from five manufacturers, inclusive of quadrupole time-of-flight (QTOF) and quadrupole orbitrap "exactive" (QE) mass spectrometers by Agilent (QTOF), Bruker (QTOF), SCIEX (QTOF), Waters (QTOF), and Thermo QE. We assessed fragment ion variations at multiple collisional energies (0, 10, 20, and 40 eV) using the cosine scoring algorithm for comparisons and the number of fragments observed. A parallel visual analysis of the MS/MS spectra across instruments was conducted, consistent with a standard procedure that is used to circumvent the still prevalent issue of mischaracterizations as shown for dimethyl sphingosine and C20 sphingosine. Our analysis revealed a notable consistency in MS/MS data and identifications, with fragment ions' / values exhibiting the highest concordance between instrument platforms at 20 eV, the other collisional energies (0, 10, and 40 eV) were significantly lower. While moving toward a standardized ESI MS/MS protocol is required for dependable molecular characterization, our results also underscore the continued importance of corroborating MS/MS data against standards to ensure accurate identifications. Our findings suggest that ESI MS/MS manufacturers, akin to the established norms for gas chromatography mass spectrometry instruments, should standardize the collision energy at 20 eV across different instrument platforms.
PubChem 作为一个综合性的数据库,包含超过 1 亿个独特的化学结构,涵盖了代谢、药物、毒理学、化妆品、农业等多个领域的化学知识。这些小分子的快速鉴定越来越依赖于电喷雾电离(ESI)与串联质谱(MS/MS)的结合,尤其是与真实的标准 MS/MS 数据集相比。尽管 ESI-MS/MS 得到了广泛的应用,但在各种分析平台上实现 MS/MS 数据的一致性仍然是一个未解决的问题。本研究评估了来自 100 个分子标准品的 MS/MS 数据,这些数据是使用来自 5 家制造商的仪器获得的,包括安捷伦(QTOF)、布鲁克(QTOF)、SCIEX(QTOF)、沃特世(QTOF)和赛默飞(QE)的四极杆飞行时间(QTOF)和四极杆轨道阱“exactive”(QE)质谱仪。我们使用余弦评分算法评估了多个碰撞能量(0、10、20 和 40 eV)下的碎片离子变化,并比较了观察到的碎片数量。我们还对仪器之间的 MS/MS 谱进行了平行的视觉分析,这与一种标准程序一致,该程序用于避免像二甲基鞘氨醇和 C20 鞘氨醇那样仍然普遍存在的特征描述错误的问题。我们的分析表明,MS/MS 数据和鉴定具有显著的一致性,在 20 eV 时,仪器平台之间的碎片离子的 m/z 值具有最高的一致性,其他碰撞能量(0、10 和 40 eV)则显著降低。虽然需要朝着可信赖的分子特征化的标准化 ESI-MS/MS 协议发展,但我们的结果也强调了需要将 MS/MS 数据与标准品进行对比,以确保准确的鉴定。我们的研究结果表明,ESI-MS/MS 制造商应该像气相色谱质谱仪器的既定规范一样,在不同的仪器平台上标准化 20 eV 的碰撞能量。