Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, UK.
Independent consultant, Beijing, China.
Global Health. 2024 Mar 26;20(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12992-024-01030-2.
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) causes high levels of global mortality. There is a global need to develop new antimicrobials to replace those whose efficacy is being eroded, but limited incentive for companies to engage in R&D, and a limited pipeline of new drugs. There is a recognised need for policies in the form of 'push' and 'pull' incentives to support this R&D. This article discusses China, a country with a rapidly emerging pharmaceuticals and biotech (P&B) sector, and a history of using coordinated innovation and industrial policy for strategic and developmental ends. We investigate the extent to which 'government guidance funds' (GGFs), strategic industrial financing vehicles (a 'push' mechanism), support the development of antimicrobials as part of China's 'mission-driven' approach to innovation and industrial policy. GGFs are potentially globally significant, having raised approximately US$ 872 billion to 2020.
GGFs have a substantial role in P&B, but almost no role in developing new antimicrobials, despite this being a priority in the country's AMR National Action Plan. There are multiple constraints on GGFs' ability to function as part of a mission-driven approach to innovation at present, linked to their business model and the absence of standard markets for antimicrobials (or other effective 'pull' mechanisms), their unclear 'social' mandate, and limited technical capacity. However, GGFs are highly responsive to changing policy demands and can be used strategically by government in response to changing needs.
Despite the very limited role of GGFs in developing new antimicrobials, their responsiveness to policy means they are likely to play a larger role as P&B becomes an increasingly important component of China's innovation and industrial strategy. However, for GGFs to effectively play that role, there is a need for reforms to their governance model, an increase in technical and managerial capacity, and supporting ('pull') incentives, particularly for pharmaceuticals such as antimicrobials for which there is strong social need, but a limited market. Given GGFs' scale and strategic importance, they deserve further research as China's P&B sector becomes increasingly globally important, and as the Chinese government commits to a larger role in global health.
抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)导致了高死亡率。全球急需开发新的抗菌药物来替代那些疗效正在减弱的药物,但公司参与研发的动力有限,新药物的研发管道也有限。为了支持这项研发,需要制定以“推动”和“拉动”激励措施为形式的政策。本文讨论了中国,一个医药和生物技术(P&B)行业迅速崛起的国家,有着利用协调创新和产业政策实现战略和发展目标的历史。我们调查了“政府引导基金”(GGFs)作为“推动”机制,在多大程度上支持了作为中国“使命驱动”创新和产业政策一部分的抗菌药物的开发。截至 2020 年,GGFs 已筹集约 8720 亿美元,具有潜在的全球重要性。
GGFs 在 P&B 中发挥了重要作用,但在开发新的抗菌药物方面几乎没有发挥作用,尽管这是中国国家抗微生物药物耐药性行动计划的优先事项。目前,GGFs 作为使命驱动创新方法的一部分发挥作用存在多种限制,这与它们的商业模式以及缺乏标准的抗菌药物市场(或其他有效的“拉动”机制)、不明确的“社会”任务以及有限的技术能力有关。然而,GGFs 对政策需求的变化反应非常迅速,政府可以根据变化的需求进行战略性地利用。
尽管 GGFs 在开发新的抗菌药物方面的作用非常有限,但由于 P&B 成为中国创新和产业战略越来越重要的组成部分,它们对政策的响应能力意味着它们可能会发挥更大的作用。然而,为了让 GGFs 有效地发挥作用,需要对其治理模式进行改革,增加技术和管理能力,并提供支持(拉动)激励措施,特别是对于社会需求强烈但市场有限的抗菌药物等药品。鉴于 GGFs 的规模和战略重要性,随着中国 P&B 行业在全球变得越来越重要,以及中国政府承诺在全球卫生领域发挥更大的作用,它们值得进一步研究。