Department of Economics, Istanbul Ticaret University, Istanbul, 34445, Turkey.
Nizami Gajanvi Research Center of Sustainable Development & Green Economy, Azerbaijan State University of Economics, Baku, Azerbaijan.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Apr;31(19):28290-28305. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32676-5. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
This article contributes to the carbon pricing debate by providing new evidence on the aggregate macroeconomic effect of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) in the Eurozone. To this end, a novel macroeconomic performance index is created to capture the overall economic performance of the Eurozone countries. The index is a weighted aggregation of key macroeconomic variables-GDP growth rate, inflation rate, employment rate, exchange rate, and long-term inflation rate-for the 19 member countries of the group. The effect of the EU ETS on this macroeconomic performance index is then empirically examined while controlling for the effects of physical capital accumulation, human capital accumulation and regulatory quality. A panel framework covering the period 2005-2022 is set up to achieve this objective and the relationship is examined using panel method of moments quantile regression with fixed effects, as well as fixed and random effects regressions of Driscoll and Kraay. A number of important revelations are made. Firstly, the behavior of the macroeconomic performance index constructed clearly reflects the economic reality of the Eurozone, with downward spikes visible in periods corresponding with the economic crisis of 2007-2009, the Eurozone debt crisis of 2010/2011, the aftermath of the financial crisis of 2016, and periods around the outbreak of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Hence, a case is made for the use of the macroeconomic performance index as a superior aggregate measure of the overall economic performance in empirical research. Secondly, a statistically significant negative effect of the EU ETS on aggregate macroeconomic performance in the Eurozone is confirmed. This shows that there are significant economic costs associated with the use of carbon pricing as a means of lowering pollution. Thirdly, the findings further show that the negative impact gradually decreases (in absolute values) from lower to higher quantiles. Overall, higher carbon prices cause greater economic disruption when macroeconomic performance is relatively poor but have less damaging effect when aggregate economic performance is relatively strong. Policy recommendations based on the study findings are also provided.
本文通过提供新的证据,为关于欧盟排放交易体系(EU ETS)在欧元区的总体宏观经济效应的碳定价辩论做出了贡献。为此,创建了一个新的宏观经济绩效指数,以捕捉欧元区国家的整体经济表现。该指数是对该集团 19 个成员国的关键宏观经济变量(国内生产总值增长率、通货膨胀率、就业率、汇率和长期通货膨胀率)的加权总和。然后,在控制物质资本积累、人力资本积累和监管质量效应的情况下,实证检验了 EU ETS 对这一宏观经济绩效指数的影响。为此,建立了一个涵盖 2005-2022 年期间的面板框架,并使用面板矩分位数回归的固定效应以及 Driscoll 和 Kraay 的固定和随机效应回归来检验这种关系。得出了一些重要的发现。首先,构建的宏观经济绩效指数的行为清楚地反映了欧元区的经济现实,在与 2007-2009 年经济危机、2010/2011 年欧元区债务危机、2016 年金融危机余波以及冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行爆发前后相对应的时期,指数出现了明显的下降。因此,有理由将宏观经济绩效指数用作实证研究中整体经济表现的优越综合衡量标准。其次,确认了 EU ETS 对欧元区总体宏观经济绩效的统计上显著的负面影响。这表明,使用碳定价作为降低污染的手段会带来重大的经济成本。第三,研究结果进一步表明,负面影响的绝对值逐渐从较低的分位数减少到较高的分位数。总体而言,当宏观经济表现较差时,较高的碳价会导致更大的经济混乱,但当总体经济表现较强时,其破坏性影响较小。还根据研究结果提出了政策建议。