Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, 300 West Morgan Street, Durham, NC 27701, USA.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/AnitaKelseyMD.
Med Clin North Am. 2024 May;108(3):427-439. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2023.11.002. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
There are unique advantages and disadvantages to functional versus anatomic testing in the work-up of patients who present with symptoms suggestive of obstructive coronary artery disease. Evaluation of these individuals starts with an assessment of pre-test probability, which guides subsequent testing decisions. The choice between anatomic and functional testing depends on this pre-test probability. In general, anatomic testing has particular utility among younger individuals and women; while functional testing can be helpful to rule-in ischemia and guide revascularization decisions. Ultimately, selection of the most appropriate test should be individualized to the patient and clinical scenario.
在对有阻塞性冠状动脉疾病症状的患者进行检查时,功能测试与解剖测试各有其独特的优势和劣势。对这些个体的评估首先从对术前可能性的评估开始,这指导了后续的测试决策。解剖测试和功能测试之间的选择取决于术前可能性。一般来说,解剖测试在年轻个体和女性中具有特殊的作用;而功能测试有助于确定缺血并指导血运重建决策。最终,选择最合适的测试应根据患者和临床情况个体化。