Center for Research in Health Sciences, Universidade Norte do Paraná (Unopar), Paraná, Londrina, 86041-140, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Cuiabá, 79070-900, Brazil.
Exp Brain Res. 2024 May;242(5):1011-1024. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06821-y. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) represents the most common type of dementia. A crucial mechanism attributed to its development is amyloid beta (Aβ) dynamics dysregulation. The extent to which exercise can modulate this phenomenon is uncertain. The aim of this study was to summarize the existing literature evaluating this issue. A comprehensive systematic search was performed in Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and SciELO databases and completed in August 2023, aiming to identify randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of exercise upon Aβ-related pathology. The keywords "exercise" and "amyloid beta", as well as all their equivalents and similar terms, were used. For the analysis, the negative or positive dementia status of the subjects was initially considered and then the soluble amyloid precursor protein (sAPP) components and Aβ fragments separately. A meta-analysis was performed and involved eight studies (moderate-to-high quality) and 644 assessments, which were 297 for control and 347 for exercise. No overall effect favoring exercise interventions was observed for both negative (SMD95%=0,286 [-0,131; 0,704]; p = 0,179) or positive AD dementia status (SMD95%=0,110 [-0,155; 0,375]; p = 0,416). The absence of an overall effect favoring exercise interventions was also found for Aβ peptides (SMD95%=0,226 [-0,028; 0,480]; p = 0,081) and for sAPP components (SMD95%=-0,038 50 [-0,472; 0,396]; p = 0,863) levels. Our findings suggest that exercise interventions do not improve Aβ-related pathology in both healthy individuals and individuals with dementia (SMD95%=0,157 [-0,059; 0,373]; p = 0,155), indicating that the beneficial effects of exercise for AD reported in previous studies are related to other mechanistic effects rather than direct amyloid effects (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023426912).
阿尔茨海默病(AD)是最常见的痴呆类型。其发病机制的一个关键因素是淀粉样β(Aβ)动态失调。运动在多大程度上可以调节这种现象尚不确定。本研究旨在总结现有的评估这一问题的文献。我们在 Pubmed、Scopus、Embase、Web of Science 和 SciELO 数据库中进行了全面的系统检索,并于 2023 年 8 月完成,旨在确定评估运动对 Aβ相关病理学影响的随机对照试验。关键词是“运动”和“淀粉样β”,以及它们所有的等效和相似术语。在分析中,首先考虑了研究对象的阴性或阳性痴呆状态,然后分别考虑可溶性淀粉样前体蛋白(sAPP)成分和 Aβ片段。进行了荟萃分析,涉及 8 项研究(中高度质量)和 644 项评估,其中对照组 297 项,运动组 347 项。对于阴性(SMD95%=0.286 [-0.131; 0.704];p=0.179)或阳性 AD 痴呆状态(SMD95%=0.110 [-0.155; 0.375];p=0.416),均未观察到运动干预有利于的总体效果。对于 Aβ肽(SMD95%=0.226 [-0.028; 0.480];p=0.081)和 sAPP 成分(SMD95%=-0.038 50 [-0.472; 0.396];p=0.863)水平,也未发现运动干预有利于的总体效果。我们的研究结果表明,运动干预既不能改善健康个体也不能改善痴呆个体的 Aβ相关病理(SMD95%=0.157 [-0.059; 0.373];p=0.155),这表明先前研究中报道的运动对 AD 的有益影响与其他机制效应有关,而不是直接的淀粉样效应(PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42023426912)。