Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; Department of Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas.
J Surg Educ. 2024 May;81(5):647-655. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.02.001. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires residency programs to complete competency-based assessments of medical trainees based on nationally established Milestones. Previous research demonstrates a strong correlation between CCC and resident scores on the Milestones in surgery, but little is known if this is true between specialties. In this study, we investigated a variety of specialties and sought to determine what factors affect self-assessment of milestones. In addition, a post-hoc analysis was completed on the COVID-19 pandemic effects on self-evaluation.
This is an IRB approved observational study on prospectively collected self-evaluation milestone data that is used within each ACGME program's Clinical Competency Committees. Medical trainees within the San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium were approached for possible participation in this study with permission from program directors.
There was no significant difference between self-assessments and CCC-assessments based on self-identified gender or residency type (surgical versus nonsurgical) for any milestone domain. Within the postgraduate year (PGY) groups, the PGY5 and PGY6 tended to rate themselves higher than CCC. Chiefs (Internal Medicine PGY2/3, and General Surgery PGY5/6) tended to be more accurate in scoring themselves than the interns (PGY1) within the milestone of Interpersonal Skills and Communication (chiefs 0.5 vs. interns 0.62, p = 0.03). On post hoc analysis of self-rating, during the first wave of the COVID 19 pandemic, Post-Covid residents were more likely to underrate themselves in Systems-Based Practice compared to the Pre-Covid cohort (-0.49 vs 0.10; p = 0.007) and more likely to rate themselves higher in Professionalism (-0.54 vs. -0.10, p = 0.012).
Unique to this study and our institution, there was no gender difference found in self vs CCC evaluations. With the change in learning environment from COVID, there was also a change in ability for some learners to self-assess accurately. As medical educators, we should understand the importance of both encouraging learners to practice self-assessment as well as give feedback to trainees on their progress. We also need to educate our faculty on the use of milestones for assessment to create a true gold standard in the CCC.
毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)要求住院医师培训计划根据全国既定的里程碑,对医学实习生进行基于能力的评估。先前的研究表明,临床能力综合评估(CCC)与外科住院医师在里程碑上的评分之间存在很强的相关性,但对于其他专业是否也是如此,知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们调查了多个专业,并试图确定哪些因素会影响对里程碑的自我评估。此外,还对 COVID-19 大流行对自我评估的影响进行了事后分析。
这是一项经过机构审查委员会批准的观察性研究,使用的是每个 ACGME 计划临床能力委员会内前瞻性收集的自我评估里程碑数据。圣安东尼奥统一服务健康教育联盟内的医学实习生在获得项目主任许可的情况下被邀请参与这项研究。
基于自我认同的性别或住院医师类型(外科与非外科),任何里程碑领域的自我评估与 CCC 评估之间均无显著差异。在住院医师年(PGY)组中,PGY5 和 PGY6 级的自我评分往往高于 CCC。住院总医师(内科 PGY2/3 级和普外科 PGY5/6 级)在人际技能和沟通方面的自我评分比实习医师(PGY1)更准确(住院总医师 0.5 分,实习医师 0.62 分,p=0.03)。在 COVID-19 大流行第一波期间进行的自我评分事后分析中,与 Pre-Covid 队列相比,Post-Covid 住院医师在基于系统的实践方面更有可能低估自己(-0.49 分比 0.10 分;p=0.007),而在专业精神方面更有可能高估自己(-0.54 分比 0.10 分,p=0.012)。
与本研究和我们机构独特的是,在自我评估与 CCC 评估方面,没有发现性别差异。随着学习环境因 COVID 而改变,一些学习者自我评估的能力也发生了变化。作为医学教育者,我们应该理解鼓励学习者进行自我评估的重要性,以及向学习者提供关于其进步的反馈的重要性。我们还需要教育我们的教师使用里程碑进行评估,以在 CCC 中创建真正的黄金标准。