• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年首次被捕后 9 年的犯罪轨迹:是什么预测了谁会停止犯罪,谁会继续犯罪?

Trajectories of offending over 9 years after youths' first arrest: What predicts who desists and who continues to offend?

机构信息

University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.

Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.

出版信息

J Res Adolesc. 2024 Dec;34(4):1312-1325. doi: 10.1111/jora.12926. Epub 2024 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1111/jora.12926
PMID:38553877
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11606260/
Abstract

Antisocial and illegal behavior generally declines as youth approach adulthood, but there is significant individual variation in the timing of the peak and decline of offending from adolescence to young adulthood. There are two primary research questions in the present study. First, are there subgroups of youth who follow similar patterns of offending over the nine years after their first arrest? Second, what baseline factors predict which youth will follow each pattern of offending? Data were drawn from the Crossroads study, which includes a sample of racially and ethnically diverse boys who were interviewed regularly for 9 years following their first arrest. Boys were between 13 and 17 years old at the start of the study and were approximately 24-25 years old at the final interview. Trajectories were measured with youths' self-reported offending using latent class growth analysis (LCGA). Results indicated that there were four subgroups of youth: a stable low group (55%), an escalating group (23%), a short-term recidivist group (15%), and a persistently high group (7%). Several baseline factors distinguished the groups. In particular, the results indicated that youth who were informally processed after their first arrest were more likely to be in the low offending group than any of the other LCGA groups. Age at first arrest, peer delinquency, exposure to violence, substance use, callous-unemotional traits, physical aggression, and perceptions of police legitimacy were also significantly related to group membership. Results suggest that certain risk factors identified after youths' first arrest may predict which youth continue to offend and which desist.

摘要

反社会和非法行为通常随着年轻人接近成年而减少,但在青少年到成年早期犯罪的高峰期和下降期,个体之间存在显著的变化。本研究有两个主要研究问题。首先,在首次被捕后的九年中,是否存在遵循相似犯罪模式的青年亚群?其次,哪些基线因素可以预测哪些青年将遵循每种犯罪模式?本研究的数据来自十字路口研究,该研究包括一个种族和民族多样化的男孩样本,这些男孩在首次被捕后定期接受了 9 年的访谈。研究开始时,男孩的年龄在 13 至 17 岁之间,在最后一次访谈时大约 24-25 岁。轨迹是通过青少年的自我报告犯罪使用潜在类别增长分析(LCGA)来衡量的。结果表明,有四个青年亚群:稳定的低犯罪组(55%)、上升组(23%)、短期累犯组(15%)和持续高犯罪组(7%)。几个基线因素可以区分这些群体。特别是,研究结果表明,在首次被捕后被非正式处理的青年更有可能属于低犯罪组,而不是任何其他 LCGA 群体。首次被捕的年龄、同伴犯罪、接触暴力、药物使用、冷酷无情特质、身体攻击以及对警察合法性的看法与群体成员身份也有显著的关系。研究结果表明,在青少年首次被捕后确定的某些风险因素可能预测哪些青年继续犯罪,哪些青年停止犯罪。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34dc/11606260/6dc0028ec54a/JORA-34-1312-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34dc/11606260/6dc0028ec54a/JORA-34-1312-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34dc/11606260/6dc0028ec54a/JORA-34-1312-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Trajectories of offending over 9 years after youths' first arrest: What predicts who desists and who continues to offend?青少年首次被捕后 9 年的犯罪轨迹:是什么预测了谁会停止犯罪,谁会继续犯罪?
J Res Adolesc. 2024 Dec;34(4):1312-1325. doi: 10.1111/jora.12926. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
2
Under the radar or under arrest: How is adolescent boys' first contact with the juvenile justice system related to future offending and arrests?在雷达之下或被捕:青少年男孩与少年司法系统的首次接触如何与未来的犯罪和被捕相关?
Law Hum Behav. 2019 Aug;43(4):342-357. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000340.
3
Does self-report of aggression after first arrest predict future offending and do the forms and functions of aggression matter?初次被捕后的自我报告的侵犯行为是否能预测未来的犯罪行为,侵犯行为的形式和功能是否重要?
Psychol Assess. 2020 Mar;32(3):265-276. doi: 10.1037/pas0000783. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
4
Is the effect of justice system attitudes on recidivism stable after youths' first arrest? Race and legal socialization among first-time youth offenders.在青少年首次被捕后,司法系统态度对累犯的影响是否稳定?首次犯罪青少年的种族与法律社会化。
Law Hum Behav. 2017 Apr;41(2):146-158. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000229. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
5
Links between trajectories of self-reported violent and nonviolent offending and official offending during adolescence and adulthood.青少年期及成年期自我报告的暴力及非暴力犯罪轨迹与官方犯罪记录之间的关联。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2014 Oct;24(4):277-90. doi: 10.1002/cbm.1935.
6
Do callous-unemotional traits moderate the effects of the juvenile justice system on later offending behavior?冷酷无情特质是否会缓和少年司法系统对后期犯罪行为的影响?
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;62(2):212-222. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13266. Epub 2020 May 25.
7
Predicting the transition from juvenile delinquency to adult criminality: Gender-specific influences in two high-risk samples.预测从青少年犯罪到成人犯罪的转变:两个高危样本中的性别特异性影响。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2016 Dec;26(5):336-351. doi: 10.1002/cbm.1957. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
8
Does mother know best? Adolescent and mother reports of impulsivity and subsequent delinquency.母亲最了解?青少年和母亲报告的冲动性与随后的违法行为。
J Youth Adolesc. 2014 Nov;43(11):1903-13. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-0080-9. Epub 2013 Dec 14.
9
Childhood predictors and age 48 outcomes of self-reports and official records of offending.童年期预测因素以及48岁时自我报告和官方犯罪记录的结果。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2014 Oct;24(4):291-304. doi: 10.1002/cbm.1929.
10
The impact of emotional disturbances on the arrest trajectories of youth as they transition into young adulthood.情绪障碍对青少年向成年早期过渡时被捕轨迹的影响。
J Youth Adolesc. 2013 Aug;42(8):1286-98. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-9974-9. Epub 2013 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing antiracist research: addressing health inequities among juvenile legal system-impacted youth using Public Health Critical Race Praxis.推进反种族主义研究:运用公共卫生批判种族实践解决受少年司法系统影响的青少年的健康不平等问题。
Health Justice. 2025 Jul 9;13(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40352-025-00346-4.
2
Life after life: Recidivism among individuals formerly sentenced to mandatory juvenile life without parole.一生又一生:曾被判处强制性无假释终身监禁的青少年的累犯情况。
J Res Adolesc. 2025 Mar;35(1):e12989. doi: 10.1111/jora.12989. Epub 2024 Jun 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Proactive and reactive aggression: Developmental trajectories and longitudinal associations with callous-unemotional traits, impulsivity, and internalizing emotions.主动攻击和反应性攻击:发展轨迹以及与冷酷无情特质、冲动性和内化情绪的纵向关联。
Dev Psychopathol. 2023 Apr 3:1-9. doi: 10.1017/S0954579423000317.
2
Does it matter in what family constellations adolescents live? Reconsidering the relationship between family structure and delinquent behaviour.青少年生活在什么样的家庭结构中重要吗?重新考虑家庭结构与不良行为之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 13;17(4):e0265964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265964. eCollection 2022.
3
Crossroads in juvenile justice: The impact of initial processing decision on youth 5 years after first arrest.
少年司法的十字路口:初次被捕 5 年后初始处理决定对青少年的影响。
Dev Psychopathol. 2021 May;33(2):700-713. doi: 10.1017/S095457942000200X.
4
Do callous-unemotional traits moderate the effects of the juvenile justice system on later offending behavior?冷酷无情特质是否会缓和少年司法系统对后期犯罪行为的影响?
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;62(2):212-222. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13266. Epub 2020 May 25.
5
DO POSITIVE PERCEPTIONS OF CORRECTIONAL STAFF MITIGATE INSTITUTIONAL VIOLENCE AMONG YOUTHFUL OFFENDERS?对惩教人员的积极看法能否减轻青少年罪犯中的机构暴力行为?
Psychol Public Policy Law. 2019 Feb;25(1):38-45. doi: 10.1037/law0000191.
6
Does self-report of aggression after first arrest predict future offending and do the forms and functions of aggression matter?初次被捕后的自我报告的侵犯行为是否能预测未来的犯罪行为,侵犯行为的形式和功能是否重要?
Psychol Assess. 2020 Mar;32(3):265-276. doi: 10.1037/pas0000783. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
7
Does the Effect of Justice System Attitudes on Adolescent Crime Vary Based on Psychosocial Maturity?司法态度对青少年犯罪的影响是否因心理社会成熟度而异?
Child Dev. 2018 Nov;89(6):e468-e479. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12983. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
8
The interplay of parental monitoring and socioeconomic status in predicting minor delinquency between and within adolescents.父母监督与社会经济地位在预测青少年之间及青少年内部的轻微犯罪方面的相互作用。
J Adolesc. 2017 Aug;59:155-165. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
9
The Longitudinal Association of Relationship Quality and Reoffending Among First-Time Juvenile Offenders and Their Mothers.初犯少年罪犯及其母亲之间关系质量与再次犯罪的纵向关联
J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Jul;46(7):1533-1546. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0679-3. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
10
Callous-unemotional traits predict self-reported offending in adolescent boys: The mediating role of delinquent peers and the moderating role of parenting practices.冷酷无情特质可预测青少年男性自我报告的犯罪行为:不良同伴的中介作用及教养方式的调节作用。
Dev Psychol. 2017 Feb;53(2):319-328. doi: 10.1037/dev0000210. Epub 2016 Oct 17.