Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Jul;105(7):1255-1261. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.03.009. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
To estimate readiness of older rehabilitation users in the United States to participate in video-based telerehabilitation and assess disparities in readiness among racial and ethnic minoritized populations, socioeconomically disadvantaged populations, and rural-dwelling older adults.
Retrospective cohort study using nationally representative survey data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study from 2015 and 2020. Survey-weighted regression models, accounting for complex survey design, were used to generate estimates of readiness and evaluate disparities across racial and ethnic, socioeconomic, and geographic subgroups. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for each comparison.
Home or community rehabilitation environments.
A cohort of 5274 home or community-based rehabilitation users aged 70 years or older (N=5274), representing a weighted 33,576,313 older adults in the United States.
Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Video-based telerehabilitation readiness was defined consistent with prior work; unreadiness was defined as lacking ownership of internet-enabled devices, limited proficiency of use, or living with severe cognitive, visual, or hearing impairment. Telerehabilitation readiness was categorized as "Ready" or "Unready".
Approximately 2 in 3 older rehabilitation users were categorized as ready to participate in video-based rehabilitation. Significantly lower rates of readiness were observed among those living in rural areas (OR=0.75, 95% CI: 0.60-0.94), financially strained individuals (OR=0.37, 95% CI: 0.26-0.53), and among individuals identifying as Black or Hispanic (as compared with non-Hispanic White older adults: Non-Hispanic Black [OR=0.23, 95% CI: 0.18-0.30]; Hispanic [OR=0.17, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.27]).
Our findings highlight significant disparities in the readiness to uptake video-based telerehabilitation. Policy and practice interventions to address telerehabilitation readiness should focus not only on improving broadband access but also on technology ownership and training to ensure equitable adoption in populations with lower baseline readiness.
评估美国老年康复使用者参与基于视频的远程康复的准备情况,并评估在少数族裔、社会经济弱势群体以及农村地区老年人中准备情况的差异。
这是一项使用 2015 年和 2020 年全国健康老龄化趋势研究的全国代表性调查数据进行的回顾性队列研究。使用调查加权回归模型,考虑到复杂的调查设计,生成准备情况的估计值,并评估种族和民族、社会经济和地理亚组之间的差异。对于每个比较,都估计了优势比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。
家庭或社区康复环境。
一个由 5274 名 70 岁或以上的家庭或社区康复使用者组成的队列(N=5274),代表美国 33576313 名年龄较大的成年人。
不适用。
基于视频的远程康复准备情况与先前的工作一致;不准备定义为缺乏互联网设备的所有权、有限的使用熟练程度或与严重认知、视觉或听力障碍一起生活。远程康复准备情况分为“准备就绪”或“未准备就绪”。
大约 2/3 的老年康复使用者被归类为准备参与基于视频的康复。在农村地区(OR=0.75,95%CI:0.60-0.94)、经济拮据的个人(OR=0.37,95%CI:0.26-0.53)以及自我认同为黑人或西班牙裔的个人(与非西班牙裔白人老年人相比:非西班牙裔黑人[OR=0.23,95%CI:0.18-0.30];西班牙裔[OR=0.17,95%CI:0.11,0.27])中,准备率明显较低。
我们的研究结果表明,在接受基于视频的远程康复的准备情况方面存在显著差异。解决远程康复准备情况的政策和实践干预措施不仅应关注改善宽带接入,还应关注技术所有权和培训,以确保在准备情况较低的人群中公平采用。