Research Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 May 2;12(5):e0416623. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04166-23. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, extensive research has been conducted on SARS-COV-2 to elucidate its genome, prognosis, and possible treatments. However, few looked at the microbial markers that could be explored in infected patients and that could predict possible disease severity. The aim of this study is to compare the nasopharyngeal microbiota of healthy subjects, moderate, under medication, and recovered SARS-COV-2 patients. In 2020, 38 nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from 6 healthy subjects, 14 moderates, 10 under medication and 8 recovered SARS-COV-2 patients at the Prince Mohammed Bin Abdulaziz Hospital Riyadh. Metatranscriptomic sequencing was performed using Minion Oxford nanopore sequencing. No significant difference in alpha as well as beta diversity was observed among all four categories. Nevertheless, we have found that spp including and were among the top 15 most abundant species detected in COVID-19 patients but not in healthy subjects. The genus was found to be associated with COVID-19 patients compared to healthy subjects. Furthermore, the abundance of was significantly higher in healthy subjects compared to recovered patients. on the other hand, was associated with under-medication patients. Taken together, our study revealed no differences in the overall microbial composition between healthy subjects and COVID-19 patients. Significant differences were seen only at specific taxonomic level. Future studies should explore the nasopharyngeal microbiota between controls and COVID-19 patients while controlling for confounders including age, gender, and comorbidities; since these latter could affect the results and accordingly the interpretation.IMPORTANCEIn this work, no significant difference in the microbial diversity was seen between healthy subjects and COVID-19 patients. Changes in specific taxa including , and were only observed. was significantly higher in healthy subjects, whereas and were mostly associated with COVID-19, and specifically with under-medication SARS-COV-2 patients, respectively. Although the COVID-19 pandemic has ended, the SARS-COV-2 virus is continuously evolving and the emergence of new variants causing more severe disease should be always kept in mind. Microbial markers in SARS-COV-2 infected patients can be useful in the early suspicion of the disease, predicting clinical outcomes, framing hospital and intensive care unit admission as well as, risk stratification. Data on which microbial marker to tackle is still controversial and more work is needed, hence the importance of this study.
在整个 COVID-19 大流行期间,广泛开展了针对 SARS-COV-2 的研究,以阐明其基因组、预后和可能的治疗方法。然而,很少有人关注感染患者中可以探索的微生物标志物,这些标志物可以预测可能的疾病严重程度。本研究旨在比较健康受试者、中度患者、药物治疗和康复的 SARS-COV-2 患者的鼻咽微生物群。2020 年,在利雅得的穆罕默德·本·阿卜杜勒阿齐兹亲王医院,从 6 名健康受试者、14 名中度患者、10 名药物治疗和 8 名康复的 SARS-COV-2 患者中采集了 38 份鼻咽拭子。使用 Minion Oxford nanopore 测序进行了宏转录组测序。在所有四个类别中,α和β多样性均无显著差异。然而,我们发现 spp 包括 和 在 COVID-19 患者中检测到的前 15 种最丰富的物种中,但在健康受试者中未检测到。与健康受试者相比,属 与 COVID-19 患者有关。此外,与康复患者相比,健康受试者中 的丰度明显更高。另一方面,与药物治疗的患者有关。总之,我们的研究表明,健康受试者和 COVID-19 患者之间的整体微生物组成没有差异。仅在特定分类水平上观察到显著差异。未来的研究应该在控制年龄、性别和合并症等混杂因素的情况下,探索对照和 COVID-19 患者之间的鼻咽微生物群;因为这些因素可能会影响结果,从而影响解释。
在这项工作中,健康受试者和 COVID-19 患者之间的微生物多样性没有差异。仅观察到特定分类群的变化,包括 、 和 。健康受试者中 的丰度较高,而 和 主要与 COVID-19 相关,特别是与药物治疗的 SARS-COV-2 患者相关。尽管 COVID-19 大流行已经结束,但 SARS-COV-2 病毒仍在不断进化,新变体引起更严重疾病的出现应始终牢记。感染 SARS-COV-2 患者的微生物标志物可用于早期怀疑疾病,预测临床结局,制定住院和重症监护病房入院以及风险分层。关于要解决的微生物标志物的数据仍存在争议,需要做更多的工作,因此这项研究非常重要。