Yale School of Nursing(S.L.F., Y.Z.), Orange, Connecticut, USA; VA Connecticut Healthcare System(S.L.F., L.H., E.A.A., K.M.A., T.F.), West Haven, Connecticut, USA.
VA Connecticut Healthcare System(S.L.F., L.H., E.A.A., K.M.A., T.F.), West Haven, Connecticut, USA; Yale Program on Aging(L.H., K.M.A., T.F.), New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Jul;68(1):22-31.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.03.022. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
Clinical practice guidelines recommend palliative care for people with advanced heart failure (aHF), yet it remains underutilized.
We examined medical center variation in specialist palliative care (SPC) and identified factors associated with variation among people with aHF.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 21,654 people with aHF who received healthcare in 83 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) from 2018-2020. We defined aHF with ICD-9/10 codes and hospitalizations. We used random intercept multilevel logistic regression to derive SPC reach (i.e., predicted probability) for each VAMC adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics. We then examined VAMC-level SPC delivery characteristics associated with predicted SPC reach including the availability of outpatient SPC (proportion of outpatient consultations), cardiology involvement (number of outpatient cardiology-initiated referrals), and earlier SPC (days from aHF identification to consultation).
Of the sample the mean age = 72.9+/-10.9 years, 97.9% were male, 61.6% were White, and 32.2% were Black. The predicted SPC reach varied substantially across VAMCs from 9% to 57% (mean: 28% [95% Confidence Interval: 25%-30%]). Only the availability of outpatient SPC was independently associated with higher SPC reach. VAMCs, in which outpatient delivery made up the greatest share of SPC consultations (9% or higher) had 11% higher rates of SPC reach relative to VAMCs with a lower proportion of outpatient SPC.
SPC reach varies widely across VAMCs for people with aHF. Outpatient palliative is common among high-reach VAMCs but its role in reach warrants further investigation. Strategies used by high-reach VAMCs may be potential targets to test for implementation and dissemination.
临床实践指南建议为晚期心力衰竭(aHF)患者提供姑息治疗,但该建议的应用仍不充分。
我们考察了医疗中心在专科姑息治疗(SPC)方面的差异,并确定了与 aHF 患者之间差异相关的因素。
我们对 2018 年至 2020 年间在 83 家退伍军人事务医疗中心(VAMC)接受医疗服务的 21654 名 aHF 患者进行了回顾性队列研究。我们使用 ICD-9/10 代码和住院记录来定义 aHF。我们使用随机截距多层逻辑回归来计算每个 VAMC 的 SPC 覆盖率(即预测概率),调整了人口统计学和临床特征。然后,我们考察了与预测 SPC 覆盖率相关的 VAMC 层面 SPC 实施特征,包括门诊 SPC 的可及性(门诊咨询的比例)、心脏病学参与度(门诊发起的转诊数量)和更早的 SPC(从识别 aHF 到咨询的天数)。
在该样本中,患者的平均年龄为 72.9+/-10.9 岁,97.9%为男性,61.6%为白人,32.2%为黑人。VAMC 之间的预测 SPC 覆盖率差异很大,从 9%到 57%(平均值:28%[95%置信区间:25%-30%])。只有门诊 SPC 的可及性与更高的 SPC 覆盖率独立相关。门诊服务占 SPC 咨询比例最高(9%或更高)的 VAMC,其 SPC 覆盖率比门诊 SPC 比例较低的 VAMC 高 11%。
VAMC 之间 aHF 患者的 SPC 覆盖率差异很大。高覆盖率的 VAMC 中常见门诊姑息治疗,但它在覆盖率方面的作用仍需进一步研究。高覆盖率 VAMC 使用的策略可能是潜在的实施和传播目标。