Ali Sk Imran, Najaf-Panah Mohammad J, Pyper Kennedi B, Lujan F Ester, Sena Johnny, Ashley Amanda K
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States.
National Center for Genome Resources, Santa Fe, NM, United States.
Front Genet. 2024 Mar 21;15:1276365. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1276365. eCollection 2024.
Maintenance of the genome is essential for cell survival, and impairment of the DNA damage response is associated with multiple pathologies including cancer and neurological abnormalities. DNA-PKcs is a DNA repair protein and a core component of the classical nonhomologous end-joining pathway, but it also has roles in modulating gene expression and thus, the overall cellular response to DNA damage. Using cells producing either wild-type (WT) or kinase-inactive (KR) DNA-PKcs, we assessed global alterations in gene expression in the absence or presence of DNA damage. We evaluated differential gene expression in untreated cells and observed differences in genes associated with cellular adhesion, cell cycle regulation, and inflammation-related pathways. Following exposure to etoposide, we compared how KR versus WT cells responded transcriptionally to DNA damage. Downregulated genes were mostly involved in protein, sugar, and nucleic acid biosynthesis pathways in both genotypes, but enriched biological pathways were divergent, again with KR cells manifesting a more robust inflammatory response compared to WT cells. To determine what major transcriptional regulators are controlling the differences in gene expression noted, we used pathway analysis and found that many master regulators of histone modifications, proinflammatory pathways, cell cycle regulation, Wnt/β-catenin signaling, and cellular development and differentiation were impacted by DNA-PKcs status. Finally, we have used qPCR to validate selected genes among the differentially regulated pathways to validate RNA sequence data. Overall, our results indicate that DNA-PKcs, in a kinase-dependent fashion, decreases proinflammatory signaling following genotoxic insult. As multiple DNA-PK kinase inhibitors are in clinical trials as cancer therapeutics utilized in combination with DNA damaging agents, understanding the transcriptional response when DNA-PKcs cannot phosphorylate downstream targets will inform the overall patient response to combined treatment.
基因组的维持对细胞存活至关重要,而DNA损伤反应的受损与包括癌症和神经异常在内的多种病理状况相关。DNA-PKcs是一种DNA修复蛋白,也是经典非同源末端连接途径的核心成分,但它在调节基因表达以及细胞对DNA损伤的整体反应中也发挥作用。我们使用产生野生型(WT)或激酶失活型(KR)DNA-PKcs的细胞,评估了在有无DNA损伤情况下基因表达的整体变化。我们评估了未处理细胞中的差异基因表达,并观察到与细胞黏附、细胞周期调控和炎症相关途径相关的基因存在差异。暴露于依托泊苷后,我们比较了KR细胞与WT细胞对DNA损伤的转录反应。在两种基因型中,下调的基因大多参与蛋白质、糖和核酸生物合成途径,但富集的生物学途径有所不同,与WT细胞相比,KR细胞再次表现出更强的炎症反应。为了确定哪些主要转录调节因子控制着所观察到的基因表达差异,我们进行了通路分析,发现许多组蛋白修饰、促炎途径、细胞周期调控、Wnt/β-连环蛋白信号传导以及细胞发育和分化的主调节因子都受到DNA-PKcs状态的影响。最后,我们使用qPCR来验证差异调节途径中的选定基因,以验证RNA序列数据。总体而言,我们的结果表明,DNA-PKcs以激酶依赖性方式减少了基因毒性损伤后的促炎信号传导。由于多种DNA-PK激酶抑制剂正在作为与DNA损伤剂联合使用的癌症治疗药物进行临床试验,了解当DNA-PKcs无法磷酸化下游靶点时的转录反应将有助于了解患者对联合治疗的整体反应。