Kissel Imke, Meerschman Iris, Tomassen Peter, D'haeseleer Evelien, Van Lierde Kristiane
Centre for Speech and Language Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Centre for Speech and Language Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
J Voice. 2024 Apr 6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.03.025.
Unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) is often characterized by severe dysphonia and has a significant impact on a patient's communication in daily and vocational situations. Having a better understanding of how UVFP influences quality of life and patient experiences can help improve patient-centered care in this population. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the lived experiences of patients with UVFP.
Twenty-five adults with UVFP (age range: 39-84years) participated in the study. Quantitative data were collected from 22 participants, using the Voice Handicap Index (VHI), Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI), and Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI). Qualitative data were collected from 25 individual semistructured interviews, which were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed with the software program NVivo. The interviews were coded using an inductive thematic approach.
Quantitative results showed a mean DSI of - 1.6, mean AVQI of 3.80, and mean VHI of 45.8 in the participant group. A statistically significant, moderate (positive) correlation was found between VHI and time after onset (in years). From the qualitative analysis of the interviews, four main themes were identified: emotional impact, psychosocial impact, physical complaints, and coping strategies. Voice problems caused by UVFP generally had a negative impact on patients' emotional and psychological well-being, with considerable effects on participation, self-identity, and professional activity. Participants demonstrated a combination of problem-focused and emotion-focused coping strategies to accommodate to these issues. Half of the participant group also showed avoidance as a coping style. VHI scores were significantly higher in participants who reported experiencing current emotional and participation problems due to UVFP, and who had not yet accepted their new voice.
The themes from this study emphasize the importance of focused anamnesis and emotive counseling in practice, with specific attention to the psychosocial and emotional impact of UVFP.
单侧声带麻痹(UVFP)通常表现为严重的发音障碍,对患者的日常和职业交流有重大影响。更好地了解UVFP如何影响生活质量和患者体验有助于改善该人群以患者为中心的护理。因此,本研究的目的是探索UVFP患者的生活经历。
25名患有UVFP的成年人(年龄范围:39 - 84岁)参与了本研究。从22名参与者中收集定量数据,使用嗓音障碍指数(VHI)、发音障碍严重程度指数(DSI)和声嗓音质量指数(AVQI)。从25次个人半结构化访谈中收集定性数据,访谈进行录音、转录,并使用NVivo软件程序进行分析。访谈采用归纳主题法进行编码。
参与者组的定量结果显示,平均DSI为 - 1.6,平均AVQI为3.80,平均VHI为45.8。发现VHI与发病后的时间(以年为单位)之间存在统计学上显著的中度(正)相关性。通过对访谈的定性分析,确定了四个主要主题:情感影响、心理社会影响、身体不适和应对策略。UVFP引起的嗓音问题通常对患者的情绪和心理健康产生负面影响,对参与、自我认同和职业活动有相当大的影响。参与者展示了以问题为中心和以情绪为中心的应对策略相结合的方式来适应这些问题。参与者组中有一半也表现出回避作为一种应对方式。报告因UVFP而经历当前情绪和参与问题且尚未接受其新嗓音的参与者的VHI得分显著更高。
本研究的主题强调了在实践中进行重点问诊和情感咨询的重要性,特别要关注UVFP的心理社会和情感影响。