Centre for Health Equity Studies, Stockholm University/Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Public Health Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
JAMA Pediatr. 2024 Jun 1;178(6):608-615. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.0378.
The 1980 and 1986 Swedish so-called speed premium policies aimed at protecting parents' income-based parental leave benefits for birth intervals shorter than 24 and 30 months, respectively, but indirectly encouraged shorter birth spacing and childbearing at older ages, both risk factors for several perinatal health outcomes. Whether those policy changes are associated with perinatal health remains unknown.
To evaluate the association between the 1980 and 1986 speed premium policies and perinatal health outcomes.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study investigated data from 1 762 784 singleton births in the Swedish Medical Birth Register from January 1, 1974, through December 31, 1991. Data were analyzed from October 11, 2022, to December 12, 2023.
Speed premium policy introduction (January 1, 1980) and extension (January 1, 1986).
Total population register data were used in an interrupted time series analysis with segmented logistic regression to calculate the odds of preterm birth, low birth weight, small for gestational age (SGA) at preterm, and stillbirth measured before and after the speed premium policy reforms. Subgroup analyses by maternal origin were conducted to evaluate changes by different policy responses.
Among 1 762 784 births analyzed, 4.8% were preterm (of which 12.0% were SGA), 3.2% had low birth weight, and 0.3% were stillbirths. The 1980 speed premium policy was associated with a 0.3% monthly increase in the odds of preterm birth compared with the period before the reform (odds ratio [OR], 1.0029 [95% CI, 1.002-1.004]), equivalent to a 26.4% increase from January 1, 1980, to December 31, 1985. After the 1986 relaxation of the policy, preterm birth odds decreased 0.5% per month (OR, 0.9951 [95% CI, 0.994-0.996]), equivalent to an 11.1% decrease across the next 6 years. Low birth weight displayed a similar pattern for both reform periods, that is, increased 0.2% (OR, 1.0021; 95% CI, 1.001-1.003) per month in 1980 through 1985 compared with baseline, and decreased 0.3% (OR, 0.9975; 95% CI, 0.996-0.998) per month in the following period, but was attenuated when considering low birth weight at term. Odds of SGA at preterm were decreased after 1980 (OR, 0.9965; 95% CI, 0.994-0.999) but not in 1986 (OR, 1.0009; 95% CI, 0.998-1.003), whereas stillbirths did not change following either reform (1980: OR, 1.0020 [95% CI, 0.999-1.005]; 1986: OR, 1.0002 [95% CI, 0.997-1.003]). Subgroup analyses suggested that perinatal health changes were restricted to births to Swedish- and Nordic-born mothers, the primary groups to adjust their fertility behaviors to the reforms.
Despite its economic advantages for couples, especially for mothers, the introduction of the speed premium policy was associated with adverse perinatal health consequences, particularly for preterm births. Family policies should be carefully designed with a "Health in All Policies" lens to avoid possible unintended repercussions for fertility behaviors and, in turn, perinatal health.
1980 年和 1986 年瑞典所谓的速度溢价政策旨在保护父母基于收入的父母育儿假福利,以确保生育间隔短于 24 个月和 30 个月,但这间接鼓励了生育间隔缩短和生育年龄更大,这两个因素都是多种围产期健康结局的风险因素。这些政策变化是否与围产期健康有关仍不清楚。
评估 1980 年和 1986 年速度溢价政策与围产期健康结局之间的关系。
设计、地点和参与者:本横断面研究调查了 1974 年 1 月 1 日至 1991 年 12 月 31 日期间瑞典医疗出生登记处 1762784 例单胎出生的数据。数据分析于 2022 年 10 月 11 日至 2023 年 12 月 12 日进行。
速度溢价政策的引入(1980 年 1 月 1 日)和扩展(1986 年 1 月 1 日)。
使用中断时间序列分析和分段逻辑回归计算早产、低出生体重、早产时小胎龄(SGA)和死产的总人群登记数据,这些结局在速度溢价政策改革前后进行测量。进行了按产妇来源的亚组分析,以评估不同政策反应的变化。
在分析的 1762784 例分娩中,4.8%为早产(其中 12.0%为 SGA),3.2%为低出生体重,0.3%为死产。与改革前相比,1980 年的速度溢价政策与每月早产几率增加 0.3%相关(比值比[OR],1.0029[95%CI,1.002-1.004]),相当于从 1980 年 1 月 1 日到 1985 年 12 月 31 日增加了 26.4%。1986 年政策放宽后,早产几率每月降低 0.5%(OR,0.9951[95%CI,0.994-0.996]),相当于在接下来的 6 年中减少了 11.1%。低出生体重在两个改革期间也呈现出类似的模式,即与基线相比,1980 年至 1985 年每月增加 0.2%(OR,1.0021[95%CI,1.001-1.003]),而在随后的时期每月降低 0.3%(OR,0.9975[95%CI,0.996-0.998]),但考虑到足月出生体重时则减弱。1980 年后,SGA 的早产几率降低(OR,0.9965[95%CI,0.994-0.999]),但 1986 年没有(OR,1.0009[95%CI,0.998-1.003]),而死产没有变化(1980 年:OR,1.0020[95%CI,0.999-1.005];1986 年:OR,1.0002[95%CI,0.997-1.003])。亚组分析表明,围产期健康变化仅限于瑞典和北欧出生的母亲的分娩,这些母亲是主要调整生育行为以适应改革的群体。
尽管速度溢价政策对夫妇,特别是对母亲来说具有经济优势,但它与不良围产期健康后果相关,特别是与早产有关。家庭政策应该谨慎设计,以“健康全纳政策”视角为指导,以避免可能对生育行为产生的意外影响,进而影响围产期健康。