Department of Trauma Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Xinjiang Clinical Research Center for Mental Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Apr 8;19(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04655-6.
Internal and external fixation are common surgical procedures for treating fractures. However, the impact of different surgical approaches (including internal and external fixations) on patients' psychological status and Quality of Life (QoL) is rarely examined. Herein, we aimed to investigate the effects of internal and external fixation on anxiety, depression, insomnia, and overall mental and physical health in Distal Radius Fractures (DRF) patients.
We performed a retrospective study on 96 fracture patients who underwent internal fixation (57 patients) or external fixation (39 patients). The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire were used to assess the patients' pain, anxiety, depression, sleep, and QoL before surgery and at seven days, one month, and three months post-surgery.
The VAS scores were significantly lower in the Internal Fixation Group (IFG) than in the External Fixation Group (EFG) on the seventh day and one month postoperatively (P < 0.05). Although both groups showed no significant anxiety, depression, or insomnia before surgery (P > 0.05), the EFG showed significantly higher HADS-A, HADS-D, and AIS scores than the IFG at seven days and one and three months postoperatively (P < 0.05). Additionally, changes in HADS-A, HADS-D, and AIS scores were most significant at day seven post-surgery in the EFG (P < 0.05). Furthermore, no significant difference was found between the two groups in the average Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores before surgery (P > 0.05). However, both groups showed positive changes in PCS and MCS scores at postoperative day seven and one and three months postoperatively, with the IFG having significantly higher average PCS and MCS scores compared to the EFG (P < 0.05).
Compared to external fixation, internal fixation did not significantly impact patients' emotions regarding anxiety and depression in the early postoperative period, and physical and mental health recovery was better during the postoperative rehabilitation period. Furthermore, when there are no absolute indications, the impact on patients' psychological well-being should be considered as one of the key factors in the treatment plan during surgical approach selection.
内固定和外固定是治疗骨折的常见手术方法。然而,不同手术方法(包括内固定和外固定)对患者心理状态和生活质量(QoL)的影响很少被研究。在此,我们旨在研究内固定和外固定对桡骨远端骨折(DRF)患者焦虑、抑郁、失眠和整体心理和身体健康的影响。
我们对 96 例接受内固定(57 例)或外固定(39 例)的骨折患者进行了回顾性研究。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)、雅典失眠量表(AIS)和医疗结局研究 36 项简短量表(SF-36)问卷评估患者术前和术后 7 天、1 个月和 3 个月时的疼痛、焦虑、抑郁、睡眠和 QoL。
术后 7 天和 1 个月时,内固定组(IFG)的 VAS 评分明显低于外固定组(EFG)(P<0.05)。虽然两组术前均无明显焦虑、抑郁或失眠(P>0.05),但术后 7 天和 1、3 个月时 EFG 的 HADS-A、HADS-D 和 AIS 评分均明显高于 IFG(P<0.05)。此外,EFG 术后第 7 天 HADS-A、HADS-D 和 AIS 评分的变化最显著(P<0.05)。此外,两组术前平均生理成分综合评分(PCS)和心理成分综合评分(MCS)无显著差异(P>0.05)。然而,两组术后第 7 天和 1、3 个月时 PCS 和 MCS 评分均呈正变化,IFG 的平均 PCS 和 MCS 评分明显高于 EFG(P<0.05)。
与外固定相比,内固定在术后早期对患者焦虑和抑郁情绪的影响不明显,在术后康复期间身体和心理健康的恢复更好。此外,在没有绝对适应证的情况下,应将对患者心理健康的影响视为手术方法选择治疗方案的关键因素之一。