Rauer Thomas, Klingebiel Felix Karl-Ludwig, Lühring Adrian, Küffer Alexander, Hofer Anna-Sophie, Ferrari Raphael Marco, Kupka Michael, Pape Hans-Christoph
Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Surgical Research, Harald Tscherne Laboratory for Orthopaedic and Trauma Research, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Dec;50(6):3039-3048. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02510-1. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
With the growing technical options of power transmission and energy-saving options in electric drives, the number of E-bike-related accidents especially in an elderly population has increased. The aim of the current study was to compare if the increased velocity in comparison to conventional bikes translates into different injury patterns in the cranio-cervical and head region.
A retrospective cohort study was performed in patients admitted to our level one trauma center between 2009 and 2019 after being involved in an accident with either an E-bike, bicycle, or motorcycle and suffered cranio-cervical or traumatic brain injury.
cranio-cervical/intracranial injury pattern. Data interpretation was conducted in an interdisciplinary approach.
From 3292 patients treated in this period, we included 1068 patients. E-bikers were significantly older than bicyclists (or motorcyclists) and lay between the other two groups in terms of helmet use. Overall injury patterns of E-bikers resembled those found in motorcyclists rather than in bicyclists. E-bikers had a higher incidence of different cerebral bleedings, especially if no helmet was worn. Helmet protection of E-bikers resulted in a comparable frequency of intracranial bleeding to the helmeted bicyclists.
The overall pattern of head and cervical injuries in E-bikers resembles more to that of motorcyclists than that of bicyclists. As they are used by a more senior population, multiple risk factors apply in terms of complications and secondary intracranial bleeding. Our study suggests that preventive measures should be reinforced, i.e., use of helmets to prevent from intracranial injury.
随着电力传输技术选择和电动驱动节能选择的不断增加,与电动自行车相关的事故数量,尤其是在老年人群体中,有所上升。本研究的目的是比较与传统自行车相比,电动自行车速度的提高是否会导致颅颈和头部区域出现不同的损伤模式。
对2009年至2019年间因电动自行车、自行车或摩托车事故而导致颅颈或创伤性脑损伤,入住我们一级创伤中心的患者进行回顾性队列研究。
颅颈/颅内损伤模式。采用多学科方法进行数据解读。
在这一时期治疗的3292名患者中,我们纳入了1068名患者。电动自行车骑行者的年龄明显大于自行车骑行者(或摩托车骑行者),在头盔使用方面介于其他两组之间。电动自行车骑行者的总体损伤模式更类似于摩托车骑行者,而非自行车骑行者。电动自行车骑行者出现不同类型脑出血的发生率更高,尤其是在未佩戴头盔的情况下。电动自行车骑行者佩戴头盔后,颅内出血的频率与佩戴头盔的自行车骑行者相当。
电动自行车骑行者头部和颈部损伤的总体模式更类似于摩托车骑行者,而非自行车骑行者。由于电动自行车更多地被老年人群使用,在并发症和继发性颅内出血方面存在多种风险因素。我们的研究表明,应加强预防措施,即使用头盔以预防颅内损伤。