Interventional Radiology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, No. 17 Lujiang Road, Luyang District, Hefei, 230001, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, 233030, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Hepatol Int. 2024 Aug;18(4):1227-1237. doi: 10.1007/s12072-024-10656-8. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
Performing a Transjugular intrahepatic portal system shunt (TIPS) in patients with portal vein cavernous transformation (CTPV) poses significant challenges. As an alternative, transjugular extrahepatic portal vein shunt (TEPS) may offer a potential solution for these patients. Nonetheless, the effectiveness and safety of TEPS remain uncertain. This case series study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TEPS in treating patients with CTPV portal hypertension complications.
The study encompassed a cohort of 22 patients diagnosed with CTPV who underwent TEPS procedures. Of these, 13 patients manifested recurrent hemorrhagic episodes subsequent to conventional therapies, 8 patients grappled with recurrent or refractory ascites, and 1 patient experienced acute bleeding but refused endoscopic treatment. Comprehensive postoperative monitoring was conducted for all patients to rigorously evaluate both the technical and clinical efficacy of the intervention, as well as long-term outcomes.
The overall procedural success rate among the 22 patients was 95.5% (21/22).During the TEPS procedure, nine patients were guided by percutaneous splenic access, three patients were guided by percutaneous hepatic access, five patients were guided by transmesenteric vein access from the abdomen, and two patients were guided by catheter marking from the hepatic artery. Additionally, guidance for three patients was facilitated by pre-existing TIPS stents. The postoperative portal pressure gradient following TEPS demonstrated a statistically significant decrease compared to preoperative values (24.95 ± 3.19 mmHg vs. 11.48 ± 1.74 mmHg, p < 0.01).Although three patients encountered perioperative complications, their conditions ameliorated following symptomatic treatment, and no procedure-related fatalities occurred. During a median follow-up period of 14 months, spanning a range of 5 to 39 months, we observed four fatalities. Specifically, one death was attributed to hepatocellular carcinoma, while the remaining three were ascribed to chronic liver failure. During the follow-up period, no instances of shunt dysfunction were observed.
Precision-guided TEPS appears to be a safe and efficacious intervention for the management of CTPV.
在门静脉海绵样变性(CTPV)患者中进行经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)具有很大的挑战性。作为一种替代方法,经颈静脉肝外门静脉分流术(TEPS)可能为这些患者提供一种潜在的解决方案。然而,TEPS 的有效性和安全性仍不确定。本病例系列研究旨在评估 TEPS 治疗 CTPV 门静脉高压并发症的疗效和安全性。
该研究纳入了 22 例诊断为 CTPV 并接受 TEPS 治疗的患者。其中,13 例患者在常规治疗后出现反复出血发作,8 例患者出现反复或难治性腹水,1 例患者出现急性出血但拒绝内镜治疗。对所有患者进行了全面的术后监测,以严格评估干预的技术和临床疗效以及长期结果。
22 例患者的总体手术成功率为 95.5%(21/22)。在 TEPS 手术过程中,9 例患者经皮脾内入路,3 例患者经皮肝内入路,5 例患者经腹部肠系膜静脉入路,2 例患者经肝动脉导管标记入路。此外,3 例患者通过预先存在的 TIPS 支架进行引导。TEPS 术后门静脉压力梯度与术前相比有统计学显著下降(24.95±3.19mmHg 比 11.48±1.74mmHg,p<0.01)。虽然有 3 例患者发生围手术期并发症,但经对症治疗后病情改善,无与手术相关的死亡病例发生。在中位随访 14 个月(5 至 39 个月)期间,我们观察到 4 例死亡。具体而言,1 例死亡归因于肝细胞癌,其余 3 例归因于慢性肝功能衰竭。在随访期间,未观察到分流功能障碍。
经精确引导的 TEPS 似乎是治疗 CTPV 的一种安全有效的方法。