Suppr超能文献

一项关于信息手册对肺癌筛查后患者报告结果和随访影响的交替干预先导试验。

An alternating-intervention pilot trial on the impact of an informational handout on patient-reported outcomes and follow-up after lung cancer screening.

机构信息

Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States of America.

Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Apr 10;19(4):e0300352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300352. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer screening (LCS) can reduce lung cancer mortality; however, poor understanding of results may impact patient experience and follow-up. We sought to determine whether an informational handout accompanying LCS results can improve patient-reported outcomes and adherence to follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective alternating intervention pilot trial of a handout to accompany LCS results delivery.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing LCS in a multisite program over a 6-month period received a mailing containing either: 1) a standardized form letter of LCS results (control) or 2) the LCS results letter and the handout (intervention).

INTERVENTION

A two-sided informational handout on commonly asked questions after LCS created through iterative mixed-methods evaluation with both LCS patients and providers.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes of 1)patient understanding of LCS results, 2)correct identification of next steps in screening, and 3)patient distress were measured through survey. Adherence to recommended follow-up after LCS was determined through chart review. Outcomes were compared between the intervention and control group using generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

389 patients were eligible and enrolled with survey responses from 230 participants (59% response rate). We found no differences in understanding of results, identification of next steps in follow-up or distress but did find higher levels of knowledge and understanding on questions assessing individual components of LCS in the intervention group. Follow-up adherence was overall similar between the two arms, though was higher in the intervention group among those with positive findings (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences in self-reported outcomes between the groups or overall follow-up adherence. Those receiving the intervention did report greater understanding and knowledge of key LCS components, and those with positive results had a higher rate of follow-up. This may represent a feasible component of a multi-level intervention to address knowledge and follow-up for LCS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05265897.

摘要

简介

肺癌筛查(LCS)可以降低肺癌死亡率;然而,对结果的理解不佳可能会影响患者的体验和随访。我们旨在确定随 LCS 结果提供的信息手册是否可以改善患者报告的结果并提高对随访的依从性。

研究设计

这是一项前瞻性、交替干预的试验,研究了随 LCS 结果提供的手册。

设置/参与者:在 6 个月的时间里,在一个多地点的项目中接受 LCS 的患者收到了一封邮件,其中包含:1)LCS 结果的标准格式信函(对照组)或 2)LCS 结果信函和手册(干预组)。

干预措施

通过与 LCS 患者和提供者进行迭代混合方法评估创建了一份关于 LCS 后常见问题的双面信息手册。

结果测量

主要结果是 1)患者对 LCS 结果的理解,2)正确识别筛查的后续步骤,以及 3)患者的痛苦,通过调查进行测量。通过病历审查确定 LCS 后推荐的随访依从性。使用广义估计方程比较干预组和对照组的结果。

结果

共有 389 名符合条件的患者入组,有 230 名参与者(59%的回复率)提供了调查回复。我们发现,在理解结果、识别随访的后续步骤或痛苦方面没有差异,但在干预组中,对评估 LCS 各个组成部分的问题的知识和理解水平更高。在两个组之间,总体上随访依从性相似,但在干预组中,阳性结果的患者随访率更高(p = 0.007)。

结论

两组之间的自我报告结果或总体随访依从性没有差异。接受干预的患者确实报告了对关键 LCS 成分的理解和认识的提高,而阳性结果的患者随访率更高。这可能代表一种可行的多层次干预措施,以解决 LCS 的知识和随访问题。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05265897。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8465/11006146/677a3e28d600/pone.0300352.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验